LeaderboardsSEO Agencies

Top 44 SEO Agencies in AI Answers — September 2026

Which seo agencies AI answer engines name when buyers ask who to hire. One fixed prompt set, every firm scored on the same basis.

Summary

Searchbloom and Thrive Internet Marketing Agency tie for the lead among AI answer engines at 11.3% named frequency each, but neither holds a margin over the other, and the category shows a steep drop-off behind them. The field is highly concentrated: the top 5 brands account for 47.7% of all mentions, while 27 brands tracked received zero mentions across all engines and prompts. This measurement covers 40 fixed prompts run once against each of 6 engines (Claude, ChatGPT, Google Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Overview, Grok) in September 2026, producing 231 scored answers. The 1,471 total citations from engines point overwhelmingly to third-party review and directory sites—74.2% went to domains other than the vendors' own—with Clutch, DesignRush, and Semrush's agency database receiving the most frequent citations.

  • Searchbloom and Thrive Internet Marketing Agency are named equally at 11.3% across all prompts, with zero-point difference between them.
  • Perplexity diverges sharply from other engines, naming Thrive at 22.5% and Searchbloom at 20% compared to 5.4% average across the other five engines.
  • 27 of 44 tracked brands received zero mentions across all six engines and all 40 prompts.
  • The top 5 agencies (Searchbloom, Thrive, WebFX, Victorious, and First Page Sage) account for 47.7% of all brand mentions.
  • WebFX holds the highest domain citation rate at 18.2% and appears in engines' own lists as a source, unlike most competitors.
  • Clutch.co, DesignRush, and Semrush's agency database together account for 141 of 1,471 citations, with 74.2% of all citations pointing to third-party sites rather than vendor domains.
  • Grok returns zero citations despite naming 10 distinct brands, while Perplexity cites brands' own domains at 2%, the highest rate among all engines.
Prompts
40
Engines
6
Answers scored
231
Period
September 2026
Prompt set
v1
Brands ranked
44 of 44
Category median
0%
No answer
9

Every brand is scored against the same 40 prompts. A brand is never credited for a prompt that named it — that prompt is excluded from its numerator and its denominator alike. Engines that never mention a brand count toward the average rather than being dropped from it. 44 brands were measured; the 44 that AI engines actually named are ranked below.

#BrandBlended(4 engines)ChatGPTClaudeGoogle GeminiPerplexityGoogle AI OverviewSERP featureGrokno web searchBest rankBrand report
1
Searchbloom
11%
17/151
3%
cite 0%
13%
cite 0%
10%
cite 0%
20%
cite 0%
3%
cite 0%
0%
cite n/a
—See the 134 they lost
2
Thrive Internet Marketing Agency
thrive-internet.com
11%
17/151
0%
cite 0%
15%
cite 0%
6%
cite 0%
23%
cite 0%
10%
cite 0%
0%
cite n/a
—See the 134 they lost
3
WebFX
webfx.com
1 negative mention
11%
16/151
8%
cite 3%
5%
cite 5%
10%
cite 13%
20%
cite 53%
8%
cite 3%
23%
cite n/a
3See the 135 they lost
4
Victorious
victoriousseo.com
8%
12/151
5%
cite 0%
10%
cite 0%
10%
cite 0%
8%
cite 0%
3%
cite 0%
15%
cite n/a
1See the 139 they lost
5
First Page Sage
7%
10/151
0%
cite 0%
8%
cite 0%
3%
cite 0%
15%
cite 0%
3%
cite 0%
0%
cite n/a
—See the 141 they lost
6
Ignite Visibility
ignitevisibility.com
5%
7/151
5%
cite 3%
5%
cite 0%
10%
cite 0%
0%
cite 5%
3%
cite 0%
8%
cite n/a
4See the 144 they lost
7
Straight North
straightnorth.com
4%
6/151
0%
cite 0%
10%
cite 0%
3%
cite 3%
3%
cite 3%
0%
cite 3%
8%
cite n/a
—See the 145 they lost
8
Focus Digital
3%
5/151
0%
cite 0%
3%
cite 0%
6%
cite 0%
5%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite n/a
—See the 146 they lost
9
Funnel Boost Media
3%
5/151
0%
cite 0%
8%
cite 0%
3%
cite 0%
3%
cite 0%
3%
cite 0%
0%
cite n/a
—See the 146 they lost
10
OuterBox
outerboxdesign.com
3%
5/151
3%
cite 0%
0%
cite 5%
0%
cite 3%
10%
cite 23%
0%
cite 3%
0%
cite n/a
—See the 146 they lost
11
Directive
directive.com
3%
4/151
3%
cite 0%
3%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
5%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
20%
cite n/a
2See the 147 they lost
12
SEO Brand
seobrand.com
3%
4/151
3%
cite 0%
5%
cite 0%
0%
cite 6%
3%
cite 5%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite n/a
—See the 147 they lost
13
Titan Growth
titangrowth.com
3%
4/151
0%
cite 0%
10%
cite 0%
0%
cite 3%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite n/a
—See the 147 they lost
14
NisonCo
1%
2/151
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
5%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite n/a
—See the 149 they lost
15
Breaking B2B
1%
1/151
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
3%
cite 0%
3%
cite 0%
0%
cite n/a
—See the 150 they lost
16
Markitors
markitors.com
1%
1/151
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
3%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite n/a
—See the 150 they lost
17
Single Grain
singlegrain.com
1 negative mention
1%
1/151
3%
cite 3%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 3%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite n/a
3See the 150 they lost
18
Accelerate Agency
accelerate.agency
0%
0/151
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite n/a
—See the 151 they lost
19
Boxi
boxi.com
0%
0/151
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite n/a
—See the 151 they lost
20
Brafton
brafton.com
0%
0/151
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite n/a
—See the 151 they lost
21
Casjay
casjay.com
0%
0/151
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite n/a
—See the 151 they lost
22
Conductor
conductor.com
0%
0/151
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
3%
cite n/a
—See the 151 they lost
23
Digital Silk
digitalsilk.com
0%
0/151
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
3%
cite n/a
—See the 151 they lost
24
Distilled
distilled.net
0%
0/151
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite n/a
—See the 151 they lost
25
Element Three
elementthree.com
0%
0/151
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite n/a
—See the 151 they lost
26
G2 Hill
g2hill.com
0%
0/151
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite n/a
—See the 151 they lost
27
HubShout
hubshout.com
0%
0/151
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite n/a
—See the 151 they lost
28
KlientBoost
klientboost.com
0%
0/151
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 3%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
3%
cite n/a
—See the 151 they lost
29
Metric Theory
metrictheory.com
0%
0/151
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite n/a
—See the 151 they lost
30
Optmyzr
optmyzr.com
0%
0/151
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite n/a
—See the 151 they lost
31
Portent
portent.com
0%
0/151
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
5%
cite n/a
—See the 151 they lost
32
Revenue River
revenueriver.com
0%
0/151
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite n/a
—See the 151 they lost
33
Searchmetrics
searchmetrics.com
0%
0/151
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
3%
cite n/a
—See the 151 they lost
34
SeoClarity
seoclarity.net
0%
0/151
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite n/a
—See the 151 they lost
35
Seoplus+
seoplus.ca
0%
0/151
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite n/a
—See the 151 they lost
36
SERPhouse
serphouse.com
0%
0/151
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite n/a
—See the 151 they lost
37
SevenAtoms
sevenatoms.com
0%
0/151
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 3%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite n/a
—See the 151 they lost
38
Siteimprove
siteimprove.com
0%
0/151
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 6%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite n/a
—See the 151 they lost
39
SparkPost
sparkpost.com
0%
0/151
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite n/a
—See the 151 they lost
40
Station Two
stationtwo.com
0%
0/151
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite n/a
—See the 151 they lost
41
ThinkSEM
thinksem.com
0%
0/151
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite n/a
—See the 151 they lost
42
Wpromote
wpromote.com
0%
0/151
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite n/a
—See the 151 they lost
43
WSI
wsinewmarket.com
0%
0/151
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite n/a
—See the 151 they lost
44
Zazzle Media
zazzlemedia.co.uk
0%
0/151
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite n/a
—See the 151 they lost

Mention = the brand is named in the answer text. Citation = the brand's domain appears in that answer's sources. Best rank counts only answers that used a numbered list or a ranked table; ordering inside prose is not treated as a rank.

Get the October 2026 movement report

A ranked list is a snapshot. Next month we re-run the same prompts and send you what changed in SEO Agencies — who gained, who slipped, and which sources drove it.

One email a month when the rankings refresh. Unsubscribe any time.

Monthly snapshots

Every month we re-run the same prompt set, and every month is kept exactly as it published. Nothing is overwritten.

How the SEO Agencies field performed

Searchbloom and Thrive Internet Marketing Agency share the top position at 11.3% named frequency, but their paths to that ranking diverge by engine. Thrive shows strength at Claude (15%) and dominates at Perplexity (22.5%), but records 0% at Grok and ChatGPT. Searchbloom performs more consistently across the middle range, peaking at Perplexity (20%) and Claude (12.5%) but falling to 2.5% or lower at Google Gemini, Google AI Overview, and Grok. Neither brand achieved citations from its own domain despite being named frequently, indicating that engines favor third-party sources when they cite at all.

WebFX, Victorious, and First Page Sage round out the top five. WebFX (10.6%) stands apart for achieving 18.2% citations from its own domain—webfx.com—the highest rate in the ranking; it appears most prominently at Grok (22.5%) and Perplexity (20%). Victorious (7.9%) peaks at Grok (15%) and Claude (10%) but drops to 2.5% or lower at Google AI Overview and ChatGPT. First Page Sage (6.6%) relies heavily on Claude (7.5%) and Perplexity (15%) while recording 0% at Grok and ChatGPT. The next tier—Ignite Visibility (4.6%), Straight North (4%), Focus Digital (3.3%), Funnel Boost Media (3.3%), and OuterBox (3.3%)—shows further fragmentation by engine, with no brand achieving more than 10% on any single engine except Ignite Visibility at Google Gemini (9.7%).

Below the top ten, mention frequency drops sharply. Directive (2.6%) spikes unusually at Grok (20%) but records 0% or near-zero at Google Gemini, Google AI Overview, and Perplexity, suggesting a single strong recommender rather than consistent visibility. SEO Brand (2.6%) and Titan Growth (2.6%) distribute more evenly across engines with lower peaks. NisonCo (1.3%), Breaking B2B (0.7%), Markitors (0.7%), and Single Grain (0.7%) record single-digit or sub-percent mention rates, with Single Grain notably appearing in engines' lists but also recording one negative mention across the dataset.

Twenty-seven brands received zero mentions: Accelerate Agency, Boxi, Brafton, Casjay, Conductor, Digital Silk, Distilled, Element Three, G2 Hill, HubShout, KlientBoost (0% named despite 0.6% domain citation), Metric Theory, Optmyzr, Portent, Revenue River, Searchmetrics, SeoClarity, Seoplus+, SERPhouse, SevenAtoms, Siteimprove, SparkPost, Station Two, ThinkSEM, Wpromote, WSI, and Zazzle Media. Among these, only KlientBoost, SevenAtoms, Siteimprove, and Portent registered any domain citations at all, and at rates below 2%. The zero-mention category represents 61% of tracked brands, indicating extreme concentration at the top of the field.

How the engines differ

The six engines show starkly different recommendation behavior. Perplexity names the most distinct brands (14) and concentrates most heavily on leaders: it places Thrive at 22.5%, Searchbloom at 20%, and WebFX at 20%, creating an outsized share of top-tier mentions. Claude names 12 distinct brands and distributes more broadly, with Thrive at 15%, Victorious at 10%, and Straight North at 10%. Google Gemini, ChatGPT, and Google AI Overview each name only 8 or 9 distinct brands and favor narrower slices of the field. Grok names 10 brands but shows extreme concentration: it places WebFX and Directive each at 22.5% while recording 0% for most competitors, suggesting fewer but more decisive recommendations.

Citation behavior diverges even more sharply. Perplexity cites brands' own domains in 2% of answers—the highest rate—while Google Gemini and Grok follow at 0.8% and 0%, respectively. Claude, ChatGPT, and Google AI Overview all cite at rates below 0.3%. Grok returns zero citations despite naming brands, relying entirely on unaided names. Across all engines, third-party directories and review sites dominate: Clutch.co, DesignRush, and Semrush's agency database account for 141 citations, while vendor domains like webfx.com and clutch.co (a vendor's own site) collectively receive only 386 of 1,471 total citations. This 74.2% reliance on external sources indicates that engines prioritize established review platforms over vendor sites for credibility.

The divergence between engines creates a fractured competitive landscape. A brand ranked top-5 on Perplexity may rank outside the top-15 on ChatGPT or Google AI Overview; Directive's 20% at Grok versus 0% at Google Gemini exemplifies this fragmentation. No single brand achieves balanced strength across all six engines, suggesting that recommendation patterns reflect each engine's training data, citation policies, and algorithm rather than a consensus on category leaders. Buyers using different AI answer engines will receive meaningfully different recommendations.

Questions about this data

Which SEO agencies are recommended most by AI answer engines?

Searchbloom and Thrive Internet Marketing Agency tie for the top position, each named in 11.3% of AI answers across all six engines tested. WebFX follows at 10.6%, Victorious at 7.9%, and First Page Sage at 6.6%. These five brands account for 47.7% of all mentions in the dataset.

Does one AI engine recommend different agencies than the others?

Yes, significantly. Perplexity names Thrive at 22.5% and Searchbloom at 20%, far above the 5.4% average across the other five engines; Grok places WebFX and Directive each at 22.5% but records 0% for many competitors that other engines name regularly. Claude distributes more broadly across 12 distinct brands, while ChatGPT, Google Gemini, and Google AI Overview each mention only 8 or 9 brands total.

How many agencies received no mentions at all?

27 of 44 tracked brands received zero mentions across all 40 prompts and all six engines. These include Accelerate Agency, Boxi, Brafton, Casjay, Conductor, Digital Silk, Distilled, Element Three, and 19 others, representing 61% of the tracked field.

What sources do AI engines cite when recommending agencies?

Engines cite third-party review and directory sites 74.2% of the time. Clutch.co received 59 citations, DesignRush 46, and Semrush's agency database 36, combined accounting for 141 of 1,471 total citations. Vendor domains themselves appear in citations only 386 times (26.2%), with webfx.com at 32 citations being the most-cited vendor site.

Do agencies cited by AI engines also appear in their source lists?

Rarely. Most named agencies receive zero citations from their own domains: Searchbloom, Thrive, Victorious, and First Page Sage—the top four brands by mention frequency—are each cited 0% from their own sites. WebFX is the exception at 18.2% domain citations, while Ignite Visibility (1.9%) and Straight North (1.4%) achieve minimal domain citation despite being named in answers.

How was this measurement conducted?

40 fixed prompts asking for SEO agency recommendations were run once against each of 6 AI answer engines (Claude, ChatGPT, Google Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Overview, and Grok) in September 2026, producing 231 scored answers total. Prompts that directly named a brand were excluded from that brand's score to ensure fair measurement. 44 distinct agencies were tracked across 1,471 total citations from 586 distinct source domains.

Which AI engine cites its sources most frequently?

Perplexity cites brands' own domains in 2% of answers, the highest rate. Google Gemini cites at 0.8%, while Claude, ChatGPT, and Google AI Overview each cite below 0.3%. Grok returns zero citations despite naming 10 distinct brands, making it the only engine that provides no source attribution for its recommendations.

The 40 prompts we tested— every brand scored against the same set

No prompt names a brand. A prompt that names one hands it a guaranteed mention — in our per-brand audit data, prompts naming a brand return a 97.5% mention rate against 8.6% for prompts that don't.

  1. 1best seo agencyrecommendation9 brands
  2. 2top seo agencies 2026recommendation12 brands
  3. 3who should i hire for seorecommendation0 brands
  4. 4seo agency near merecommendation6 brands
  5. 5affordable seo agencyrecommendation1 brand
  6. 6seo agencies that actually workrecommendation10 brands
  7. 7seo agency reviewsrecommendation9 brands
  8. 8how to choose an seo agencyawareness0 brands
  9. 9seo agency for real estateindustry4 brands
  10. 10seo agency for healthcareindustry5 brands
  11. 11seo agency for constructionindustry3 brands
  12. 12seo agency for nonprofitsindustry1 brand
  13. 13seo services for law firmsindustry0 brands
  14. 14seo agency for ecommerceindustry4 brands
  15. 15cheap seo agencyuse-case1 brand
  16. 16seo agency under $500 a monthuse-case1 brand
  17. 17mid market seo agencyuse-case3 brands
  18. 18enterprise level seo agencyuse-case5 brands
  19. 19freelance seo vs agencycomparison0 brands
  20. 20boutique vs full service seo agencycomparison0 brands
  21. 21should i hire an seo agency or do it in housecomparison1 brand
  22. 22small seo agency vs largecomparison0 brands
  23. 23local seo agency vs nationalcomparison0 brands
  24. 24seo agency for b2b saasuse-case3 brands
  25. 25seo agency for startupsuse-case2 brands
  26. 26seo agency for local businessesuse-case5 brands
  27. 27seo agency for small teamsuse-case5 brands
  28. 28seo agency with in house teamuse-case4 brands
  29. 29seo agencies that guarantee resultsrecommendation2 brands
  30. 30seo agency for my real estate brokerageindustry2 brands
  31. 31seo for dental practiceindustry0 brands
  32. 32seo for plumbing contractorindustry0 brands
  33. 33seo agency for online storeindustry5 brands
  34. 34seo agency for accounting firmindustry2 brands
  35. 35seo agency for therapistindustry2 brands
  36. 36white label seo agencyuse-case1 brand
  37. 37seo agency that charges per resultuse-case3 brands
  38. 38seo retainer agencyuse-case0 brands
  39. 39should i hire seo agency or consultantcomparison0 brands
  40. 40specialized seo agency vs generalistcomparison0 brands

Most cited sources

The domains these engines pulled from when answering. 1,471 citations across 586 distinct domains, 74% of them to third-party sites rather than to a vendor's own domain — that share is roughly how much of this category's visibility is decided off-site.

#SourceCitationsPromptsEnginesShare
1clutch.covendor site592754.0%
2designrush.comvendor site462343.1%
3thriveagency.com412242.8%
4agencies.semrush.com361832.4%
5justdial.com36512.4%
6seo.comvendor site332042.2%
7webfx.comvendor site322252.2%
8firstpagesage.com281541.9%
9linkedin.comvendor site231741.6%
10youtube.com211511.4%
11siegemedia.comvendor site191321.3%
12searchbloom.com161231.1%
13seoprofy.com151141.0%
14coalitiontechnologies.comvendor site141031.0%
15goodfirms.co141031.0%
16outerboxdesign.comvendor site141141.0%
17reddit.com141231.0%
181digitalagency.com131010.9%
19onelittleweb.com13930.9%
20google.comvendor site12810.8%
21quora.com121120.8%
22webtonic.io12730.8%
23resultfirst.comvendor site10440.7%
24seranking.comvendor site10740.7%
25highervisibility.com9810.6%
26semrush.comvendor site9740.6%
27thestacc.comvendor site9850.6%
28darkroomagency.comvendor site8630.5%
29embarque.io8730.5%
30focus-digital.co8530.5%
31seo.co8710.5%
32finance.yahoo.com7520.5%
33silverbackstrategies.com7520.5%
34einpresswire.com6410.4%
35expertmarket.com6520.4%
36loopexdigital.com6430.4%
37percepture.com6430.4%
38respona.com6530.4%
39searchengineland.com6620.4%
40seosherpa.com6610.4%

Top 40 of the domains cited in this run. Grok is absent from these counts entirely — it answers without web search and returns no sources.

About this data

Everything here is derived from publicly available output. We sent 40 prompts to 6 publicly accessible AI answer engines and recorded which brands each engine named and which sources it cited. No private, proprietary or customer data is involved, and no brand paid for or influenced its position.

Every answer behind these numbers is retained, so any figure on this page can be traced back to the specific prompt, engine and response that produced it.

If your company appears here and you believe the result is wrong, get in touch — we are happy to re-run the analysis for your brand and share what we find. If you would prefer not to be listed, we can remove your company name from this leaderboard in most cases. Either way, email [email protected].