Top 37 SEO Agencies in AI Answers — August 2026
Which seo agencies AI answer engines name when buyers ask who to hire. One fixed prompt set, every firm scored on the same basis.
Summary
First Page Sage, Thrive Internet Marketing Agency, and WebFX each appeared in 9% of AI answer engine responses to 40 fixed SEO agency prompts in August 2026, tied for the category lead with zero-point separation. The field is highly fragmented: 29 of 49 tracked brands were never named once, and the category median is 0%, indicating no consensus recommendation across engines. The measurement tested 235 total answers across six engines (Claude, ChatGPT, Google Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Overview, and Grok), excluding any prompt that named a brand in advance. Of 1,453 total citations to sources, 84.5% pointed to third-party domains rather than vendors' own websites, with reddit.com, clutch.co, and thriveagency.com appearing most frequently.
- Three agencies tied for first place at 9% naming rate: First Page Sage, Thrive Internet Marketing Agency, and WebFX, with zero percentage points separating them.
- 29 of 49 tracked brands were never named by any engine across all 235 answers, indicating minimal visibility in AI recommendations.
- Perplexity names First Page Sage on 27.5% of prompts versus 3.1% average across the other five engines, showing significant engine divergence.
- Only two brands received more than 5% self-domain citations: Clutch at 17.7% and OuterBox at 4.4%, while 36 brands cited themselves 0% of the time.
- 84.5% of all 1,453 citations went to third-party websites rather than the agencies' own domains.
- Grok returns zero citations across all responses, while Perplexity averages 1.7% self-domain citation rate, the highest among engines.
Every brand is scored against the same 40 prompts. A brand is never credited for a prompt that named it — that prompt is excluded from its numerator and its denominator alike. Engines that never mention a brand count toward the average rather than being dropped from it. 37 brands were measured; the 37 that AI engines actually named are ranked below.
| # | Brand | Blended(4 engines) | ChatGPT | Claude | Google Gemini | Perplexity | Google AI OverviewSERP feature | Grokno web search | Best rank | Brand report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | WebFX webfx.com 1 negative mention | 9% 14/156 | 3% cite 0% | 15% cite 3% | 6% cite 6% | 13% cite 15% | 13% cite 10% | 23% cite n/a | 1 | See the 142 they lost |
| 2 | Victorious victoriousseo.com 2 negative mentions | 8% 13/156 | 3% cite 0% | 8% cite 0% | 8% cite 0% | 15% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 18% cite n/a | 1 | See the 143 they lost |
| 3 | Ignite Visibility ignitevisibility.com | 5% 8/156 | 3% cite 0% | 8% cite 3% | 3% cite 0% | 8% cite 0% | 3% cite 3% | 5% cite n/a | 2 | See the 148 they lost |
| 4 | Directive directive.com 1 negative mention | 3% 5/156 | 0% cite 0% | 3% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 10% cite 0% | 3% cite 0% | 28% cite n/a | 1 | See the 151 they lost |
| 5 | OuterBox outerboxdesign.com | 2% 3/156 | 3% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 3% | 5% cite 15% | 3% cite 13% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 153 they lost |
| 6 | Straight North straightnorth.com | 2% 3/156 | 0% cite 0% | 3% cite 3% | 0% cite 3% | 5% cite 3% | 0% cite 5% | 8% cite n/a | 7 | See the 153 they lost |
| 7 | SEO Brand seobrand.com | 1% 1/156 | 0% cite 0% | 3% cite 0% | 0% cite 3% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 3% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 155 they lost |
| 8 | Single Grain singlegrain.com | 1% 1/156 | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 3% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 155 they lost |
| 9 | Accelerate Agency accelerate.agency | 0% 0/156 | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 156 they lost |
| 10 | Boxi boxi.com | 0% 0/156 | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 156 they lost |
| 11 | Brafton brafton.com | 0% 0/156 | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 156 they lost |
| 12 | Casjay casjay.com | 0% 0/156 | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 156 they lost |
| 13 | Conductor conductor.com | 0% 0/156 | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 156 they lost |
| 14 | Digital Silk digitalsilk.com | 0% 0/156 | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 156 they lost |
| 15 | Distilled distilled.net | 0% 0/156 | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 156 they lost |
| 16 | Element Three elementthree.com | 0% 0/156 | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 156 they lost |
| 17 | G2 Hill g2hill.com | 0% 0/156 | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 156 they lost |
| 18 | HubShout hubshout.com | 0% 0/156 | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 156 they lost |
| 19 | KlientBoost klientboost.com | 0% 0/156 | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 3% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 156 they lost |
| 20 | Markitors markitors.com | 0% 0/156 | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 156 they lost |
| 21 | Metric Theory metrictheory.com | 0% 0/156 | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 156 they lost |
| 22 | Optmyzr optmyzr.com | 0% 0/156 | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 156 they lost |
| 23 | Portent portent.com 1 negative mention | 0% 0/156 | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 13% cite n/a | — | See the 156 they lost |
| 24 | Revenue River revenueriver.com | 0% 0/156 | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 156 they lost |
| 25 | Searchmetrics searchmetrics.com | 0% 0/156 | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 156 they lost |
| 26 | SeoClarity seoclarity.net | 0% 0/156 | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 156 they lost |
| 27 | Seoplus+ seoplus.ca | 0% 0/156 | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 156 they lost |
| 28 | SERPhouse serphouse.com | 0% 0/156 | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 156 they lost |
| 29 | SevenAtoms sevenatoms.com | 0% 0/156 | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 156 they lost |
| 30 | Siteimprove siteimprove.com | 0% 0/156 | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 5% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 156 they lost |
| 31 | SparkPost sparkpost.com | 0% 0/156 | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 156 they lost |
| 32 | Station Two stationtwo.com | 0% 0/156 | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 156 they lost |
| 33 | ThinkSEM thinksem.com | 0% 0/156 | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 156 they lost |
| 34 | Titan Growth titangrowth.com | 0% 0/156 | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 156 they lost |
| 35 | Wpromote wpromote.com | 0% 0/156 | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 156 they lost |
| 36 | WSI wsinewmarket.com | 0% 0/156 | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 156 they lost |
| 37 | Zazzle Media zazzlemedia.co.uk | 0% 0/156 | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 156 they lost |
This is the first published month for this category, so there is no prior period to compare against and no change figures are shown. Mention = the brand is named in the answer text. Citation = the brand's domain appears in that answer's sources. Best rank counts only answers that used a numbered list or a ranked table; ordering inside prose is not treated as a rank.
Get the September 2026 movement report
A ranked list is a snapshot. Next month we re-run the same prompts and send you what changed in SEO Agencies — who gained, who slipped, and which sources drove it.
One email a month when the rankings refresh. Unsubscribe any time.
Monthly snapshots
Every month we re-run the same prompt set, and every month is kept exactly as it published. Nothing is overwritten. Once there are two, this section is where the month-over-month movement will be charted.
How the SEO Agencies field performed
Three agencies lead the ranking at 9% naming frequency: First Page Sage, Thrive Internet Marketing Agency, and WebFX. First Page Sage shows extreme engine concentration, appearing in 27.5% of Perplexity responses but only 0% to 7.7% across all others. Thrive Internet Marketing Agency demonstrates more balanced distribution, ranging from 7.5% to 15.4%, while WebFX appears most consistently across engines from 2.5% to 22.5%, though none cite its own domain at scale. WebFX alone among the three earned self-domain citations at 5.8%, and appears at position 1 in response lists, though it received one negative mention.
The second tier consists of Victorious (8.3%), Clutch (7.7%), Ignite Visibility (5.1%), and Searchbloom (5.1%). Victorious shows uneven engine performance, appearing in 15% of Perplexity responses but 0% in Google AI Overview. Clutch stands apart with 17.7% self-domain citations and the widest distribution across engines, ranging 5% to 30% by source. Clutch also reached position 1 in response lists and appears as the most-cited source overall at 42 citations. Ignite Visibility and Searchbloom each hover around 5%, with Searchbloom showing 12.8% on Google AI Overview but 0% on ChatGPT and Grok.
Ahrefs, Focus Digital, Funnel Boost Media, Semrush, Directive, and the single-digit percentile brands (Screaming Frog through Straight North, all between 3.8% and 1.9%) form a long middle section with minimal consistency. Ahrefs at 3.8% and Semrush at 3.8% are tool providers occasionally named; both cite themselves at low rates (1.9% and 4.1% respectively), and Ahrefs received one negative mention. Directive at 3.2% shows heavy engine divergence—27.5% on Grok but 0% to 10% elsewhere—and appears at position 1 in some lists. Breaking B2B, NisonCo, OuterBox, Straight North, and SEO Brand all register under 2%, with OuterBox earning 4.4% self-domain citations and Straight North appearing at position 7 in response lists.
Single Grain appears at 0.6%, the lowest-named brand with any mentions at all. The remaining 29 brands—Accelerate Agency, Boxi, Brafton, Casjay, Conductor, Digital Silk, Distilled, Element Three, G2 Hill, HubShout, KlientBoost, Markitors, Metric Theory, Optmyzr, Portent, Revenue River, Searchmetrics, SeoClarity, Seoplus+, SERPhouse, SevenAtoms, Siteimprove, SparkPost, Station Two, ThinkSEM, Titan Growth, Wpromote, WSI, and Zazzle Media—received 0% naming across all engines. One exception: KlientBoost earned 0.6% self-domain citations despite 0% naming, and Portent received one negative mention from Grok despite 0% naming.
How the engines differ
The six engines diverge sharply in breadth and focus. Claude and Perplexity each name 16 distinct brands, the broadest coverage, while Grok names only 11 and ChatGPT names 9, the narrowest. Perplexity concentrates heavily on First Page Sage (27.5%), nearly nine times the 3.1% average across other engines, showing strong outlier behavior. Claude spreads more evenly, with WebFX as its highest-named brand at 15%. Google Gemini and Google AI Overview each name 12 distinct brands, and ChatGPT shows the most conservative distribution, with Clutch as its leader at only 12.5%.
Citation behavior varies dramatically by engine. Grok returns zero citations across all answers, making it purely a recommender without source attribution. Perplexity cites brands' own domains on 1.7% of answers, the highest rate among the five citing engines. Google AI Overview averages 1.2% self-domain citations, Google Gemini 0.7%, Claude 0.4%, and ChatGPT 0.3%, with all engines citing third-party sources far more frequently than vendor domains. Of the top source domains, reddit.com (50 citations), clutch.co (42), and thriveagency.com (37) account for a majority, reflecting engines' reliance on peer review, directories, and vendor-owned content published elsewhere.
Engine preference shapes which brands appear visible. Clutch leads on Grok (30%), ChatGPT (12.5%), and Claude (5%), but appears far less on Perplexity (7.5%) and Google Gemini (5.6%), suggesting Grok and ChatGPT weight directory and review credibility higher. Perplexity's outsized preference for First Page Sage reflects its engine design, which may favor thought leadership or specific content patterns. Grok shows concentrated, dramatic swings: Clutch at 30%, Directive at 27.5%, WebFX at 22.5%, and Victorious at 17.5%, while all other engines spread recommendations more evenly, suggesting Grok's prompt interpretation or ranking algorithm operates on distinct principles from the others.
Questions about this data
Which SEO agencies are recommended most by AI answer engines?
First Page Sage, Thrive Internet Marketing Agency, and WebFX tie for first at 9% across the measured set of 235 answers from six engines in August 2026. No agency received more than 9% overall naming frequency, making this a highly fragmented category with no dominant recommendation.
Does Perplexity recommend different agencies than other engines?
Yes. Perplexity names First Page Sage on 27.5% of prompts versus 3.1% averaged across the other five engines, a nearly ninefold difference. Perplexity also diverges on other leaders, showing 17.5% for Thrive versus 10.5% across others, indicating its ranking algorithm or source weighting differs substantially.
How many agencies were never recommended by any AI engine?
29 of 49 tracked brands received 0% naming across all engines and all 235 answers, including Accelerate Agency, Boxi, Brafton, Casjay, Conductor, Digital Silk, Distilled, Element Three, G2 Hill, HubShout, KlientBoost, Markitors, Metric Theory, Optmyzr, Portent, Revenue River, Searchmetrics, SeoClarity, Seoplus+, SERPhouse, SevenAtoms, Siteimprove, SparkPost, Station Two, ThinkSEM, Titan Growth, Wpromote, WSI, and Zazzle Media.
Do AI engines cite the agencies' own websites?
Rarely. Of 1,453 total citations across 630 domains, only 15.5% pointed to vendors' own domains. Clutch (17.7% self-domain citations) and OuterBox (4.4%) were exceptions; 36 agencies cited themselves 0% of the time. Grok cites no domains at all, and ChatGPT self-cites at only 0.3% of answers.
What sources do the engines cite most frequently?
reddit.com leads at 50 citations across 27 prompts, followed by clutch.co (42 citations), thriveagency.com (37), and firstpagesage.com (31). These four sources account for significant share of all citations, with reddit.com and third-party review sites dominating engines' source attribution.
How was this measurement conducted?
40 fixed prompts were run once each against six AI answer engines (Claude, ChatGPT, Google Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Overview, and Grok) in August 2026, producing 235 scored answers. Prompts that named a brand in advance were excluded from that brand's scoring to prevent inflated numbers. All 49 brands were measured against the same prompts.
Which engine cites the most sources?
Perplexity cites branded own domains on 1.7% of answers, the highest among the five engines that cite at all. Google AI Overview follows at 1.2% self-domain citations, and Grok returns zero citations in any response, relying purely on narrative recommendation without source attribution.
The 40 prompts we tested— every brand scored against the same set
No prompt names a brand. A prompt that names one hands it a guaranteed mention — in our per-brand audit data, prompts naming a brand return a 97.5% mention rate against 8.6% for prompts that don't.
- 1best seo agencyrecommendation10 brands
- 2top seo agencies 2026recommendation10 brands
- 3who should i hire for seorecommendation4 brands
- 4seo agency near merecommendation2 brands
- 5affordable seo agencyrecommendation7 brands
- 6seo agencies that actually workrecommendation9 brands
- 7seo agency reviewsrecommendation10 brands
- 8how to choose an seo agencyawareness4 brands
- 9seo agency for real estateindustry3 brands
- 10seo agency for healthcareindustry4 brands
- 11seo agency for constructionindustry5 brands
- 12seo agency for nonprofitsindustry2 brands
- 13seo services for law firmsindustry2 brands
- 14seo agency for ecommerceindustry4 brands
- 15cheap seo agencyuse-case3 brands
- 16seo agency under $500 a monthuse-case4 brands
- 17mid market seo agencyuse-case4 brands
- 18enterprise level seo agencyuse-case3 brands
- 19freelance seo vs agencycomparison2 brands
- 20boutique vs full service seo agencycomparison0 brands
- 21should i hire an seo agency or do it in housecomparison0 brands
- 22small seo agency vs largecomparison0 brands
- 23local seo agency vs nationalcomparison0 brands
- 24seo agency for b2b saasuse-case3 brands
- 25seo agency for startupsuse-case5 brands
- 26seo agency for local businessesuse-case6 brands
- 27seo agency for small teamsuse-case9 brands
- 28seo agency with in house teamuse-case4 brands
- 29seo agencies that guarantee resultsrecommendation6 brands
- 30seo agency for my real estate brokerageindustry4 brands
- 31seo for dental practiceindustry1 brand
- 32seo for plumbing contractorindustry3 brands
- 33seo agency for online storeindustry6 brands
- 34seo agency for accounting firmindustry3 brands
- 35seo agency for therapistindustry3 brands
- 36white label seo agencyuse-case4 brands
- 37seo agency that charges per resultuse-case1 brand
- 38seo retainer agencyuse-case0 brands
- 39should i hire seo agency or consultantcomparison0 brands
- 40specialized seo agency vs generalistcomparison0 brands
Most cited sources
The domains these engines pulled from when answering. 1,453 citations across 630 distinct domains, 85% of them to third-party sites rather than to a vendor's own domain — that share is roughly how much of this category's visibility is decided off-site.
| # | Source | Citations | Prompts | Engines | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | reddit.com | 50 | 27 | 3 | 3.4% |
| 2 | clutch.covendor site | 42 | 20 | 5 | 2.9% |
| 3 | thriveagency.com | 37 | 19 | 4 | 2.5% |
| 4 | firstpagesage.com | 31 | 19 | 4 | 2.1% |
| 5 | agencies.semrush.com | 22 | 11 | 3 | 1.5% |
| 6 | coalitiontechnologies.comvendor site | 21 | 12 | 4 | 1.4% |
| 7 | designrush.com | 20 | 15 | 4 | 1.4% |
| 8 | linkedin.comvendor site | 19 | 13 | 2 | 1.3% |
| 9 | seo.comvendor site | 18 | 13 | 4 | 1.2% |
| 10 | youtube.com | 18 | 13 | 2 | 1.2% |
| 11 | outerboxdesign.comvendor site | 16 | 7 | 3 | 1.1% |
| 12 | seoprofy.com | 16 | 12 | 4 | 1.1% |
| 13 | resultfirst.com | 15 | 4 | 4 | 1.0% |
| 14 | searchbloom.com | 15 | 9 | 4 | 1.0% |
| 15 | google.comvendor site | 14 | 1 | 1 | 1.0% |
| 16 | embarque.io | 13 | 10 | 3 | 0.9% |
| 17 | webfx.comvendor site | 13 | 10 | 4 | 0.9% |
| 18 | focus-digital.co | 11 | 7 | 3 | 0.8% |
| 19 | onelittleweb.com | 11 | 9 | 3 | 0.8% |
| 20 | webtonic.io | 11 | 6 | 3 | 0.8% |
| 21 | 1digitalagency.com | 10 | 6 | 2 | 0.7% |
| 22 | siegemedia.comvendor site | 9 | 6 | 3 | 0.6% |
| 23 | softtrix.com | 9 | 5 | 4 | 0.6% |
| 24 | beomniscient.com | 8 | 6 | 3 | 0.6% |
| 25 | seranking.comvendor site | 8 | 7 | 3 | 0.6% |
| 26 | breakingb2b.com | 7 | 2 | 3 | 0.5% |
| 27 | rebootonline.com | 7 | 4 | 3 | 0.5% |
| 28 | semrush.comvendor site | 7 | 6 | 2 | 0.5% |
| 29 | elevationweb.org | 6 | 1 | 3 | 0.4% |
| 30 | goodfirms.co | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0.4% |
| 31 | growandconvert.com | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0.4% |
| 32 | helium-seo.com | 6 | 3 | 4 | 0.4% |
| 33 | luxurypresence.com | 6 | 2 | 3 | 0.4% |
| 34 | nathanojaokomo.com | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0.4% |
| 35 | seotuners.com | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0.4% |
| 36 | silverbackstrategies.com | 6 | 4 | 3 | 0.4% |
| 37 | theaffordableseoservices.com | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0.4% |
| 38 | thestacc.com | 6 | 5 | 2 | 0.4% |
| 39 | thryv.com | 6 | 4 | 3 | 0.4% |
| 40 | 6smarketers.com | 5 | 5 | 2 | 0.3% |
Top 40 of the domains cited in this run. Grok is absent from these counts entirely — it answers without web search and returns no sources.
About this data
Everything here is derived from publicly available output. We sent 40 prompts to 6 publicly accessible AI answer engines and recorded which brands each engine named and which sources it cited. No private, proprietary or customer data is involved, and no brand paid for or influenced its position.
Every answer behind these numbers is retained, so any figure on this page can be traced back to the specific prompt, engine and response that produced it.
If your company appears here and you believe the result is wrong, get in touch — we are happy to re-run the analysis for your brand and share what we find. If you would prefer not to be listed, we can remove your company name from this leaderboard in most cases. Either way, email [email protected].