Top 44 SEO Agencies in AI Answers — September 2026
Which seo agencies AI answer engines name when buyers ask who to hire. One fixed prompt set, every firm scored on the same basis.
Summary
Searchbloom and Thrive Internet Marketing Agency tie for the lead among AI answer engines at 11.3% named frequency each, but neither holds a margin over the other, and the category shows a steep drop-off behind them. The field is highly concentrated: the top 5 brands account for 47.7% of all mentions, while 27 brands tracked received zero mentions across all engines and prompts. This measurement covers 40 fixed prompts run once against each of 6 engines (Claude, ChatGPT, Google Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Overview, Grok) in September 2026, producing 231 scored answers. The 1,471 total citations from engines point overwhelmingly to third-party review and directory sites—74.2% went to domains other than the vendors' own—with Clutch, DesignRush, and Semrush's agency database receiving the most frequent citations.
- Searchbloom and Thrive Internet Marketing Agency are named equally at 11.3% across all prompts, with zero-point difference between them.
- Perplexity diverges sharply from other engines, naming Thrive at 22.5% and Searchbloom at 20% compared to 5.4% average across the other five engines.
- 27 of 44 tracked brands received zero mentions across all six engines and all 40 prompts.
- The top 5 agencies (Searchbloom, Thrive, WebFX, Victorious, and First Page Sage) account for 47.7% of all brand mentions.
- WebFX holds the highest domain citation rate at 18.2% and appears in engines' own lists as a source, unlike most competitors.
- Clutch.co, DesignRush, and Semrush's agency database together account for 141 of 1,471 citations, with 74.2% of all citations pointing to third-party sites rather than vendor domains.
- Grok returns zero citations despite naming 10 distinct brands, while Perplexity cites brands' own domains at 2%, the highest rate among all engines.
Every brand is scored against the same 40 prompts. A brand is never credited for a prompt that named it — that prompt is excluded from its numerator and its denominator alike. Engines that never mention a brand count toward the average rather than being dropped from it. 44 brands were measured; the 44 that AI engines actually named are ranked below.
| # | Brand | Blended(4 engines) | ChatGPT | Claude | Google Gemini | Perplexity | Google AI OverviewSERP feature | Grokno web search | Best rank | Brand report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Searchbloom | 11% 17/151 | 3% cite 0% | 13% cite 0% | 10% cite 0% | 20% cite 0% | 3% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 134 they lost |
| 2 | Thrive Internet Marketing Agency thrive-internet.com | 11% 17/151 | 0% cite 0% | 15% cite 0% | 6% cite 0% | 23% cite 0% | 10% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 134 they lost |
| 3 | WebFX webfx.com 1 negative mention | 11% 16/151 | 8% cite 3% | 5% cite 5% | 10% cite 13% | 20% cite 53% | 8% cite 3% | 23% cite n/a | 3 | See the 135 they lost |
| 4 | Victorious victoriousseo.com | 8% 12/151 | 5% cite 0% | 10% cite 0% | 10% cite 0% | 8% cite 0% | 3% cite 0% | 15% cite n/a | 1 | See the 139 they lost |
| 5 | First Page Sage | 7% 10/151 | 0% cite 0% | 8% cite 0% | 3% cite 0% | 15% cite 0% | 3% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 141 they lost |
| 6 | Ignite Visibility ignitevisibility.com | 5% 7/151 | 5% cite 3% | 5% cite 0% | 10% cite 0% | 0% cite 5% | 3% cite 0% | 8% cite n/a | 4 | See the 144 they lost |
| 7 | Straight North straightnorth.com | 4% 6/151 | 0% cite 0% | 10% cite 0% | 3% cite 3% | 3% cite 3% | 0% cite 3% | 8% cite n/a | — | See the 145 they lost |
| 8 | Focus Digital | 3% 5/151 | 0% cite 0% | 3% cite 0% | 6% cite 0% | 5% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 146 they lost |
| 9 | Funnel Boost Media | 3% 5/151 | 0% cite 0% | 8% cite 0% | 3% cite 0% | 3% cite 0% | 3% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 146 they lost |
| 10 | OuterBox outerboxdesign.com | 3% 5/151 | 3% cite 0% | 0% cite 5% | 0% cite 3% | 10% cite 23% | 0% cite 3% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 146 they lost |
| 11 | Directive directive.com | 3% 4/151 | 3% cite 0% | 3% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 5% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 20% cite n/a | 2 | See the 147 they lost |
| 12 | SEO Brand seobrand.com | 3% 4/151 | 3% cite 0% | 5% cite 0% | 0% cite 6% | 3% cite 5% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 147 they lost |
| 13 | Titan Growth titangrowth.com | 3% 4/151 | 0% cite 0% | 10% cite 0% | 0% cite 3% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 147 they lost |
| 14 | NisonCo | 1% 2/151 | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 5% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 149 they lost |
| 15 | Breaking B2B | 1% 1/151 | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 3% cite 0% | 3% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 150 they lost |
| 16 | Markitors markitors.com | 1% 1/151 | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 3% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 150 they lost |
| 17 | Single Grain singlegrain.com 1 negative mention | 1% 1/151 | 3% cite 3% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 3% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | 3 | See the 150 they lost |
| 18 | Accelerate Agency accelerate.agency | 0% 0/151 | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 151 they lost |
| 19 | Boxi boxi.com | 0% 0/151 | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 151 they lost |
| 20 | Brafton brafton.com | 0% 0/151 | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 151 they lost |
| 21 | Casjay casjay.com | 0% 0/151 | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 151 they lost |
| 22 | Conductor conductor.com | 0% 0/151 | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 3% cite n/a | — | See the 151 they lost |
| 23 | Digital Silk digitalsilk.com | 0% 0/151 | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 3% cite n/a | — | See the 151 they lost |
| 24 | Distilled distilled.net | 0% 0/151 | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 151 they lost |
| 25 | Element Three elementthree.com | 0% 0/151 | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 151 they lost |
| 26 | G2 Hill g2hill.com | 0% 0/151 | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 151 they lost |
| 27 | HubShout hubshout.com | 0% 0/151 | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 151 they lost |
| 28 | KlientBoost klientboost.com | 0% 0/151 | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 3% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 3% cite n/a | — | See the 151 they lost |
| 29 | Metric Theory metrictheory.com | 0% 0/151 | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 151 they lost |
| 30 | Optmyzr optmyzr.com | 0% 0/151 | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 151 they lost |
| 31 | Portent portent.com | 0% 0/151 | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 5% cite n/a | — | See the 151 they lost |
| 32 | Revenue River revenueriver.com | 0% 0/151 | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 151 they lost |
| 33 | Searchmetrics searchmetrics.com | 0% 0/151 | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 3% cite n/a | — | See the 151 they lost |
| 34 | SeoClarity seoclarity.net | 0% 0/151 | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 151 they lost |
| 35 | Seoplus+ seoplus.ca | 0% 0/151 | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 151 they lost |
| 36 | SERPhouse serphouse.com | 0% 0/151 | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 151 they lost |
| 37 | SevenAtoms sevenatoms.com | 0% 0/151 | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 3% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 151 they lost |
| 38 | Siteimprove siteimprove.com | 0% 0/151 | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 6% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 151 they lost |
| 39 | SparkPost sparkpost.com | 0% 0/151 | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 151 they lost |
| 40 | Station Two stationtwo.com | 0% 0/151 | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 151 they lost |
| 41 | ThinkSEM thinksem.com | 0% 0/151 | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 151 they lost |
| 42 | Wpromote wpromote.com | 0% 0/151 | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 151 they lost |
| 43 | WSI wsinewmarket.com | 0% 0/151 | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 151 they lost |
| 44 | Zazzle Media zazzlemedia.co.uk | 0% 0/151 | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 151 they lost |
Mention = the brand is named in the answer text. Citation = the brand's domain appears in that answer's sources. Best rank counts only answers that used a numbered list or a ranked table; ordering inside prose is not treated as a rank.
Get the October 2026 movement report
A ranked list is a snapshot. Next month we re-run the same prompts and send you what changed in SEO Agencies — who gained, who slipped, and which sources drove it.
One email a month when the rankings refresh. Unsubscribe any time.
Monthly snapshots
Every month we re-run the same prompt set, and every month is kept exactly as it published. Nothing is overwritten.
How the SEO Agencies field performed
Searchbloom and Thrive Internet Marketing Agency share the top position at 11.3% named frequency, but their paths to that ranking diverge by engine. Thrive shows strength at Claude (15%) and dominates at Perplexity (22.5%), but records 0% at Grok and ChatGPT. Searchbloom performs more consistently across the middle range, peaking at Perplexity (20%) and Claude (12.5%) but falling to 2.5% or lower at Google Gemini, Google AI Overview, and Grok. Neither brand achieved citations from its own domain despite being named frequently, indicating that engines favor third-party sources when they cite at all.
WebFX, Victorious, and First Page Sage round out the top five. WebFX (10.6%) stands apart for achieving 18.2% citations from its own domain—webfx.com—the highest rate in the ranking; it appears most prominently at Grok (22.5%) and Perplexity (20%). Victorious (7.9%) peaks at Grok (15%) and Claude (10%) but drops to 2.5% or lower at Google AI Overview and ChatGPT. First Page Sage (6.6%) relies heavily on Claude (7.5%) and Perplexity (15%) while recording 0% at Grok and ChatGPT. The next tier—Ignite Visibility (4.6%), Straight North (4%), Focus Digital (3.3%), Funnel Boost Media (3.3%), and OuterBox (3.3%)—shows further fragmentation by engine, with no brand achieving more than 10% on any single engine except Ignite Visibility at Google Gemini (9.7%).
Below the top ten, mention frequency drops sharply. Directive (2.6%) spikes unusually at Grok (20%) but records 0% or near-zero at Google Gemini, Google AI Overview, and Perplexity, suggesting a single strong recommender rather than consistent visibility. SEO Brand (2.6%) and Titan Growth (2.6%) distribute more evenly across engines with lower peaks. NisonCo (1.3%), Breaking B2B (0.7%), Markitors (0.7%), and Single Grain (0.7%) record single-digit or sub-percent mention rates, with Single Grain notably appearing in engines' lists but also recording one negative mention across the dataset.
Twenty-seven brands received zero mentions: Accelerate Agency, Boxi, Brafton, Casjay, Conductor, Digital Silk, Distilled, Element Three, G2 Hill, HubShout, KlientBoost (0% named despite 0.6% domain citation), Metric Theory, Optmyzr, Portent, Revenue River, Searchmetrics, SeoClarity, Seoplus+, SERPhouse, SevenAtoms, Siteimprove, SparkPost, Station Two, ThinkSEM, Wpromote, WSI, and Zazzle Media. Among these, only KlientBoost, SevenAtoms, Siteimprove, and Portent registered any domain citations at all, and at rates below 2%. The zero-mention category represents 61% of tracked brands, indicating extreme concentration at the top of the field.
How the engines differ
The six engines show starkly different recommendation behavior. Perplexity names the most distinct brands (14) and concentrates most heavily on leaders: it places Thrive at 22.5%, Searchbloom at 20%, and WebFX at 20%, creating an outsized share of top-tier mentions. Claude names 12 distinct brands and distributes more broadly, with Thrive at 15%, Victorious at 10%, and Straight North at 10%. Google Gemini, ChatGPT, and Google AI Overview each name only 8 or 9 distinct brands and favor narrower slices of the field. Grok names 10 brands but shows extreme concentration: it places WebFX and Directive each at 22.5% while recording 0% for most competitors, suggesting fewer but more decisive recommendations.
Citation behavior diverges even more sharply. Perplexity cites brands' own domains in 2% of answers—the highest rate—while Google Gemini and Grok follow at 0.8% and 0%, respectively. Claude, ChatGPT, and Google AI Overview all cite at rates below 0.3%. Grok returns zero citations despite naming brands, relying entirely on unaided names. Across all engines, third-party directories and review sites dominate: Clutch.co, DesignRush, and Semrush's agency database account for 141 citations, while vendor domains like webfx.com and clutch.co (a vendor's own site) collectively receive only 386 of 1,471 total citations. This 74.2% reliance on external sources indicates that engines prioritize established review platforms over vendor sites for credibility.
The divergence between engines creates a fractured competitive landscape. A brand ranked top-5 on Perplexity may rank outside the top-15 on ChatGPT or Google AI Overview; Directive's 20% at Grok versus 0% at Google Gemini exemplifies this fragmentation. No single brand achieves balanced strength across all six engines, suggesting that recommendation patterns reflect each engine's training data, citation policies, and algorithm rather than a consensus on category leaders. Buyers using different AI answer engines will receive meaningfully different recommendations.
Questions about this data
Which SEO agencies are recommended most by AI answer engines?
Searchbloom and Thrive Internet Marketing Agency tie for the top position, each named in 11.3% of AI answers across all six engines tested. WebFX follows at 10.6%, Victorious at 7.9%, and First Page Sage at 6.6%. These five brands account for 47.7% of all mentions in the dataset.
Does one AI engine recommend different agencies than the others?
Yes, significantly. Perplexity names Thrive at 22.5% and Searchbloom at 20%, far above the 5.4% average across the other five engines; Grok places WebFX and Directive each at 22.5% but records 0% for many competitors that other engines name regularly. Claude distributes more broadly across 12 distinct brands, while ChatGPT, Google Gemini, and Google AI Overview each mention only 8 or 9 brands total.
How many agencies received no mentions at all?
27 of 44 tracked brands received zero mentions across all 40 prompts and all six engines. These include Accelerate Agency, Boxi, Brafton, Casjay, Conductor, Digital Silk, Distilled, Element Three, and 19 others, representing 61% of the tracked field.
What sources do AI engines cite when recommending agencies?
Engines cite third-party review and directory sites 74.2% of the time. Clutch.co received 59 citations, DesignRush 46, and Semrush's agency database 36, combined accounting for 141 of 1,471 total citations. Vendor domains themselves appear in citations only 386 times (26.2%), with webfx.com at 32 citations being the most-cited vendor site.
Do agencies cited by AI engines also appear in their source lists?
Rarely. Most named agencies receive zero citations from their own domains: Searchbloom, Thrive, Victorious, and First Page Sage—the top four brands by mention frequency—are each cited 0% from their own sites. WebFX is the exception at 18.2% domain citations, while Ignite Visibility (1.9%) and Straight North (1.4%) achieve minimal domain citation despite being named in answers.
How was this measurement conducted?
40 fixed prompts asking for SEO agency recommendations were run once against each of 6 AI answer engines (Claude, ChatGPT, Google Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Overview, and Grok) in September 2026, producing 231 scored answers total. Prompts that directly named a brand were excluded from that brand's score to ensure fair measurement. 44 distinct agencies were tracked across 1,471 total citations from 586 distinct source domains.
Which AI engine cites its sources most frequently?
Perplexity cites brands' own domains in 2% of answers, the highest rate. Google Gemini cites at 0.8%, while Claude, ChatGPT, and Google AI Overview each cite below 0.3%. Grok returns zero citations despite naming 10 distinct brands, making it the only engine that provides no source attribution for its recommendations.
The 40 prompts we tested— every brand scored against the same set
No prompt names a brand. A prompt that names one hands it a guaranteed mention — in our per-brand audit data, prompts naming a brand return a 97.5% mention rate against 8.6% for prompts that don't.
- 1best seo agencyrecommendation9 brands
- 2top seo agencies 2026recommendation12 brands
- 3who should i hire for seorecommendation0 brands
- 4seo agency near merecommendation6 brands
- 5affordable seo agencyrecommendation1 brand
- 6seo agencies that actually workrecommendation10 brands
- 7seo agency reviewsrecommendation9 brands
- 8how to choose an seo agencyawareness0 brands
- 9seo agency for real estateindustry4 brands
- 10seo agency for healthcareindustry5 brands
- 11seo agency for constructionindustry3 brands
- 12seo agency for nonprofitsindustry1 brand
- 13seo services for law firmsindustry0 brands
- 14seo agency for ecommerceindustry4 brands
- 15cheap seo agencyuse-case1 brand
- 16seo agency under $500 a monthuse-case1 brand
- 17mid market seo agencyuse-case3 brands
- 18enterprise level seo agencyuse-case5 brands
- 19freelance seo vs agencycomparison0 brands
- 20boutique vs full service seo agencycomparison0 brands
- 21should i hire an seo agency or do it in housecomparison1 brand
- 22small seo agency vs largecomparison0 brands
- 23local seo agency vs nationalcomparison0 brands
- 24seo agency for b2b saasuse-case3 brands
- 25seo agency for startupsuse-case2 brands
- 26seo agency for local businessesuse-case5 brands
- 27seo agency for small teamsuse-case5 brands
- 28seo agency with in house teamuse-case4 brands
- 29seo agencies that guarantee resultsrecommendation2 brands
- 30seo agency for my real estate brokerageindustry2 brands
- 31seo for dental practiceindustry0 brands
- 32seo for plumbing contractorindustry0 brands
- 33seo agency for online storeindustry5 brands
- 34seo agency for accounting firmindustry2 brands
- 35seo agency for therapistindustry2 brands
- 36white label seo agencyuse-case1 brand
- 37seo agency that charges per resultuse-case3 brands
- 38seo retainer agencyuse-case0 brands
- 39should i hire seo agency or consultantcomparison0 brands
- 40specialized seo agency vs generalistcomparison0 brands
Most cited sources
The domains these engines pulled from when answering. 1,471 citations across 586 distinct domains, 74% of them to third-party sites rather than to a vendor's own domain — that share is roughly how much of this category's visibility is decided off-site.
| # | Source | Citations | Prompts | Engines | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | clutch.covendor site | 59 | 27 | 5 | 4.0% |
| 2 | designrush.comvendor site | 46 | 23 | 4 | 3.1% |
| 3 | thriveagency.com | 41 | 22 | 4 | 2.8% |
| 4 | agencies.semrush.com | 36 | 18 | 3 | 2.4% |
| 5 | justdial.com | 36 | 5 | 1 | 2.4% |
| 6 | seo.comvendor site | 33 | 20 | 4 | 2.2% |
| 7 | webfx.comvendor site | 32 | 22 | 5 | 2.2% |
| 8 | firstpagesage.com | 28 | 15 | 4 | 1.9% |
| 9 | linkedin.comvendor site | 23 | 17 | 4 | 1.6% |
| 10 | youtube.com | 21 | 15 | 1 | 1.4% |
| 11 | siegemedia.comvendor site | 19 | 13 | 2 | 1.3% |
| 12 | searchbloom.com | 16 | 12 | 3 | 1.1% |
| 13 | seoprofy.com | 15 | 11 | 4 | 1.0% |
| 14 | coalitiontechnologies.comvendor site | 14 | 10 | 3 | 1.0% |
| 15 | goodfirms.co | 14 | 10 | 3 | 1.0% |
| 16 | outerboxdesign.comvendor site | 14 | 11 | 4 | 1.0% |
| 17 | reddit.com | 14 | 12 | 3 | 1.0% |
| 18 | 1digitalagency.com | 13 | 10 | 1 | 0.9% |
| 19 | onelittleweb.com | 13 | 9 | 3 | 0.9% |
| 20 | google.comvendor site | 12 | 8 | 1 | 0.8% |
| 21 | quora.com | 12 | 11 | 2 | 0.8% |
| 22 | webtonic.io | 12 | 7 | 3 | 0.8% |
| 23 | resultfirst.comvendor site | 10 | 4 | 4 | 0.7% |
| 24 | seranking.comvendor site | 10 | 7 | 4 | 0.7% |
| 25 | highervisibility.com | 9 | 8 | 1 | 0.6% |
| 26 | semrush.comvendor site | 9 | 7 | 4 | 0.6% |
| 27 | thestacc.comvendor site | 9 | 8 | 5 | 0.6% |
| 28 | darkroomagency.comvendor site | 8 | 6 | 3 | 0.5% |
| 29 | embarque.io | 8 | 7 | 3 | 0.5% |
| 30 | focus-digital.co | 8 | 5 | 3 | 0.5% |
| 31 | seo.co | 8 | 7 | 1 | 0.5% |
| 32 | finance.yahoo.com | 7 | 5 | 2 | 0.5% |
| 33 | silverbackstrategies.com | 7 | 5 | 2 | 0.5% |
| 34 | einpresswire.com | 6 | 4 | 1 | 0.4% |
| 35 | expertmarket.com | 6 | 5 | 2 | 0.4% |
| 36 | loopexdigital.com | 6 | 4 | 3 | 0.4% |
| 37 | percepture.com | 6 | 4 | 3 | 0.4% |
| 38 | respona.com | 6 | 5 | 3 | 0.4% |
| 39 | searchengineland.com | 6 | 6 | 2 | 0.4% |
| 40 | seosherpa.com | 6 | 6 | 1 | 0.4% |
Top 40 of the domains cited in this run. Grok is absent from these counts entirely — it answers without web search and returns no sources.
About this data
Everything here is derived from publicly available output. We sent 40 prompts to 6 publicly accessible AI answer engines and recorded which brands each engine named and which sources it cited. No private, proprietary or customer data is involved, and no brand paid for or influenced its position.
Every answer behind these numbers is retained, so any figure on this page can be traced back to the specific prompt, engine and response that produced it.
If your company appears here and you believe the result is wrong, get in touch — we are happy to re-run the analysis for your brand and share what we find. If you would prefer not to be listed, we can remove your company name from this leaderboard in most cases. Either way, email [email protected].