Top 44 SEO Agencies in AI Answers — August 2026
Which seo agencies AI answer engines name when buyers ask who to hire. One fixed prompt set, every firm scored on the same basis.
Summary
First Page Sage, Thrive Internet Marketing Agency, and WebFX are tied at 9% named mentions across AI answer engines, with zero-point margins separating the top positions. The field is highly concentrated: 15 brands appear in 0.6% to 9% of answers, 29 brands are never named at all, and the category median is 0%. Of the 1,453 total citation instances recorded across 630 distinct domains, 84.5% pointed to third-party sites rather than vendors' own domains, meaning most recommendations came wrapped in external authority rather than direct company websites. Perplexity diverges sharply from other engines, naming First Page Sage on 27.5% of prompts versus 3.1% average across the rest. The measurement period was August 2026, covering 40 fixed prompts run once each against Claude, ChatGPT, Google Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Overview, and Grok, producing 235 scored answers.
- First Page Sage, Thrive Internet Marketing Agency, and WebFX tied for the most mentions at 9% across 235 AI answer engine responses.
- Perplexity names First Page Sage on 27.5% of prompts, compared to 3.1% average across Claude, ChatGPT, Google Gemini, Google AI Overview, and Grok combined.
- Of 1,453 total citations across 630 domains, 84.5% went to third-party sites; only 15.5% cited vendors' own domains.
- 29 of 44 tracked agencies were never named in any AI answer engine response.
- WebFX is the only top-3 agency with 5.8% citations from its own domain; the other two leaders cite their own domains at 0%.
- Reddit was the single most-cited source at 50 citations across 27 prompts; Clutch.co and thriveagency.com each appeared in 42 and 37 citations respectively.
- Grok returns no citations at all, naming only 7 distinct brands with Directive at 27.5% of its prompts.
Every brand is scored against the same 40 prompts. A brand is never credited for a prompt that named it — that prompt is excluded from its numerator and its denominator alike. Engines that never mention a brand count toward the average rather than being dropped from it. 44 brands were measured; the 44 that AI engines actually named are ranked below.
| # | Brand | Blended(4 engines) | ChatGPT | Claude | Google Gemini | Perplexity | Google AI OverviewSERP feature | Grokno web search | Best rank | Brand report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | First Page Sage | 9% 14/156 | 0% cite 0% | 3% cite 0% | 6% cite 0% | 28% cite 0% | 8% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | 4 | See the 142 they lost |
| 2 | Thrive Internet Marketing Agency thrive-internet.com | 9% 14/156 | 0% cite 0% | 8% cite 0% | 11% cite 0% | 18% cite 0% | 15% cite 0% | 3% cite n/a | 2 | See the 142 they lost |
| 3 | WebFX webfx.com 1 negative mention | 9% 14/156 | 3% cite 0% | 15% cite 3% | 6% cite 6% | 13% cite 15% | 13% cite 10% | 23% cite n/a | 1 | See the 142 they lost |
| 4 | Victorious victoriousseo.com 2 negative mentions | 8% 13/156 | 3% cite 0% | 8% cite 0% | 8% cite 0% | 15% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 18% cite n/a | 1 | See the 143 they lost |
| 5 | Ignite Visibility ignitevisibility.com | 5% 8/156 | 3% cite 0% | 8% cite 3% | 3% cite 0% | 8% cite 0% | 3% cite 3% | 5% cite n/a | 2 | See the 148 they lost |
| 6 | Searchbloom | 5% 8/156 | 0% cite 0% | 8% cite 0% | 3% cite 0% | 10% cite 0% | 13% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 148 they lost |
| 7 | Focus Digital | 4% 6/156 | 0% cite 0% | 3% cite 0% | 3% cite 0% | 10% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 150 they lost |
| 8 | Funnel Boost Media | 4% 6/156 | 0% cite 0% | 5% cite 0% | 3% cite 0% | 8% cite 0% | 3% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 150 they lost |
| 9 | Directive directive.com 1 negative mention | 3% 5/156 | 0% cite 0% | 3% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 10% cite 0% | 3% cite 0% | 28% cite n/a | 1 | See the 151 they lost |
| 10 | Breaking B2B | 2% 3/156 | 0% cite 0% | 3% cite 0% | 3% cite 0% | 3% cite 0% | 5% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | 1 | See the 153 they lost |
| 11 | NisonCo | 2% 3/156 | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 3% cite 0% | 5% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 153 they lost |
| 12 | OuterBox outerboxdesign.com | 2% 3/156 | 3% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 3% | 5% cite 15% | 3% cite 13% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 153 they lost |
| 13 | Straight North straightnorth.com | 2% 3/156 | 0% cite 0% | 3% cite 3% | 0% cite 3% | 5% cite 3% | 0% cite 5% | 8% cite n/a | 7 | See the 153 they lost |
| 14 | SEO Brand seobrand.com | 1% 1/156 | 0% cite 0% | 3% cite 0% | 0% cite 3% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 3% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 155 they lost |
| 15 | Single Grain singlegrain.com | 1% 1/156 | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 3% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 155 they lost |
| 16 | Accelerate Agency accelerate.agency | 0% 0/156 | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 156 they lost |
| 17 | Boxi boxi.com | 0% 0/156 | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 156 they lost |
| 18 | Brafton brafton.com | 0% 0/156 | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 156 they lost |
| 19 | Casjay casjay.com | 0% 0/156 | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 156 they lost |
| 20 | Conductor conductor.com | 0% 0/156 | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 156 they lost |
| 21 | Digital Silk digitalsilk.com | 0% 0/156 | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 156 they lost |
| 22 | Distilled distilled.net | 0% 0/156 | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 156 they lost |
| 23 | Element Three elementthree.com | 0% 0/156 | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 156 they lost |
| 24 | G2 Hill g2hill.com | 0% 0/156 | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 156 they lost |
| 25 | HubShout hubshout.com | 0% 0/156 | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 156 they lost |
| 26 | KlientBoost klientboost.com | 0% 0/156 | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 3% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 156 they lost |
| 27 | Markitors markitors.com | 0% 0/156 | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 156 they lost |
| 28 | Metric Theory metrictheory.com | 0% 0/156 | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 156 they lost |
| 29 | Optmyzr optmyzr.com | 0% 0/156 | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 156 they lost |
| 30 | Portent portent.com 1 negative mention | 0% 0/156 | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 13% cite n/a | — | See the 156 they lost |
| 31 | Revenue River revenueriver.com | 0% 0/156 | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 156 they lost |
| 32 | Searchmetrics searchmetrics.com | 0% 0/156 | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 156 they lost |
| 33 | SeoClarity seoclarity.net | 0% 0/156 | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 156 they lost |
| 34 | Seoplus+ seoplus.ca | 0% 0/156 | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 156 they lost |
| 35 | SERPhouse serphouse.com | 0% 0/156 | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 156 they lost |
| 36 | SevenAtoms sevenatoms.com | 0% 0/156 | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 156 they lost |
| 37 | Siteimprove siteimprove.com | 0% 0/156 | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 5% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 156 they lost |
| 38 | SparkPost sparkpost.com | 0% 0/156 | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 156 they lost |
| 39 | Station Two stationtwo.com | 0% 0/156 | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 156 they lost |
| 40 | ThinkSEM thinksem.com | 0% 0/156 | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 156 they lost |
| 41 | Titan Growth titangrowth.com | 0% 0/156 | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 156 they lost |
| 42 | Wpromote wpromote.com | 0% 0/156 | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 156 they lost |
| 43 | WSI wsinewmarket.com | 0% 0/156 | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 156 they lost |
| 44 | Zazzle Media zazzlemedia.co.uk | 0% 0/156 | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite 0% | 0% cite n/a | — | See the 156 they lost |
This is the first published month for this category, so there is no prior period to compare against and no change figures are shown. Mention = the brand is named in the answer text. Citation = the brand's domain appears in that answer's sources. Best rank counts only answers that used a numbered list or a ranked table; ordering inside prose is not treated as a rank.
Get the September 2026 movement report
A ranked list is a snapshot. Next month we re-run the same prompts and send you what changed in SEO Agencies — who gained, who slipped, and which sources drove it.
One email a month when the rankings refresh. Unsubscribe any time.
Monthly snapshots
Every month we re-run the same prompt set, and every month is kept exactly as it published. Nothing is overwritten. Once there are two, this section is where the month-over-month movement will be charted.
How the SEO Agencies field performed
Three agencies occupy the top rank tied at 9% named mentions: First Page Sage, Thrive Internet Marketing Agency, and WebFX. First Page Sage achieves prominence almost entirely through Perplexity, which names it on 27.5% of prompts compared to negligible mentions from other engines; it cites no sources from its own domain. Thrive Internet Marketing Agency spreads its mentions more evenly, with Perplexity at 17.5%, Google AI Overview at 15.4%, and Google Gemini at 11.1%; it too cites its own domain at 0%, though thriveagency.com appears as the third most-cited source overall. WebFX performs best on its own domain with 5.8% citations and strong showings on Claude (15%), Grok (22.5%), and Google AI Overview (12.8%), though it also records one negative mention.
Victorious ranks fourth at 8.3% named mentions despite carrying two negative mentions and citing its own domain never. It appears strongest on Grok (17.5%), Google Gemini (8.3%), and Perplexity (15%), but draws zero citations from victoriousseo.com. Ignite Visibility and Searchbloom tie at 5.1% named mentions; Ignite Visibility splits its presence across engines with Perplexity and Claude each at 7.5%, while Searchbloom concentrates on Google AI Overview (12.8%) and Perplexity (10%), backed by minimal citations from ignitevisibility.com. Below these, Focus Digital (3.8%), Funnel Boost Media (3.8%), and Directive (3.2%) form a small group where brand presence begins to fragment. Directive shows extreme engine divergence: absent from Google Gemini but appearing on Grok at 27.5%, one of the highest single-engine concentrations in the ranking.
Breaking B2B (1.9%), NisonCo (1.9%), OuterBox (1.9%), Straight North (1.9%), SEO Brand (0.6%), and Single Grain (0.6%) comprise a tail where individual engine selections become highly visible. OuterBox achieves 4.4% citations from its own domain despite 1.9% named mentions, the highest domain-citation rate among agencies below the top tier. Straight North records 1.9% citations from straightnorth.com to match its named mention rate. All six of these agencies appear in isolated engine selections: Breaking B2B reaches its best position at rank 1 on one engine but appears nowhere on three others. From ranks 16 through 44, 29 agencies record exactly 0% named mentions across all 235 answers. These include established names like Accelerate Agency, Brafton, Conductor, Digital Silk, Distilled, and KlientBoost, as well as Metric Theory, Portent (which carries one negative mention), Revenue River, Searchmetrics, and Wpromote. The absence is complete and consistent: no engine names them, and none cite their own domains.
KlientBoost represents a singular anomaly in the 0% named group: despite being named on 0% of prompts, it receives 0.6% citations from klientboost.com, indicating its domain was linked as a source in the single instance where no brand recommendation occurred. Portent similarly appears only as one negative mention on Grok. The remaining 27 agencies in this tier leave no trace in the data: Casjay, Element Three, G2 Hill, HubShout, Markitors, Optmyzr, Searchmetrics, SeoClarity, SERPhouse, Siteimprove, SparkPost, Station Two, ThinkSEM, Titan Growth, WSI, and Zazzle Media each register 0% across all engines and all metrics.
How the engines differ
The six engines show radically different recommendation breadth and concentration. Claude named 12 distinct brands with WebFX leading at 15%, while ChatGPT named only 4 brands and tops out at WebFX again with 2.5%, making it the most concentrated recommender. Perplexity named 14 distinct brands (the most of any engine) but showed extreme concentration on First Page Sage at 27.5%; this represents the largest single-engine divergence from the overall average. Google Gemini and Google AI Overview each named 9 to 10 brands with less dramatic peaks: Google Gemini's highest is Thrive at 11.1% and Google AI Overview's is also Thrive at 15.4%. Grok named only 7 brands but created two violent spikes: Directive at 27.5% and Portent at 12.5% (as a negative mention), both of which barely register elsewhere.
Citation patterns diverge sharply by engine. Google AI Overview cites vendors' own domains most frequently at 0.9% of answers, followed by Perplexity at 0.7%, Google Gemini at 0.3%, and Claude at 0.2%. ChatGPT cites vendors' own domains at 0%, and Grok returns no citations at all. Across all engines, 84.5% of citations pointed to third-party sites: reddit.com led with 50 citations, clutch.co appeared in 42, and external review and comparison sites dominated the recommendation context. The most-cited vendor domains were thriveagency.com (37 citations), firstpagesage.com (31), coalitiontechnologies.com (21), and outerboxdesign.com (16), but even these appeared overwhelmingly as supporting sources within third-party pages rather than as standalone recommendations.
Questions about this data
Which SEO agencies are recommended most by AI answer engines?
First Page Sage, Thrive Internet Marketing Agency, and WebFX are tied at 9% named mentions across 235 total AI answer responses collected in August 2026. Victorious ranks fourth at 8.3%. However, no single agency achieves a commanding lead: the median brand in this category is named 0% of the time.
Why does Perplexity recommend different agencies than other AI answer engines?
Perplexity names First Page Sage on 27.5% of prompts while other engines average 3.1%, a 24.4-point gap. Similarly, Perplexity names 14 distinct brands compared to ChatGPT's 4 and Grok's 7, indicating a wider and more distributed recommendation pattern. This divergence is the most dramatic engine difference in the ranking.
How many agencies were never mentioned by any AI answer engine?
29 of the 44 tracked agencies were never named, each recording exactly 0% across all 235 answers. These include Accelerate Agency, Brafton, Conductor, Digital Silk, Distilled, Element Three, Markitors, Metric Theory, and 21 others.
How was this ranking measured?
40 fixed prompts were run once each against 6 AI answer engines (Claude, ChatGPT, Google Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Overview, and Grok) in August 2026, producing 235 scored answers. Prompts that named a brand were excluded from that brand's scoring to prevent credited bias. 44 agencies were tracked; 15 earned measurable mention rates and 29 never appeared.
Do AI answer engines cite the agencies' own websites?
Rarely. Of 1,453 total citations across 630 distinct domains, only 15.5% came from vendors' own domains; 84.5% pointed to third-party sites like Reddit, Clutch, LinkedIn, and review platforms. Google AI Overview cited vendor domains most at 0.9%, while ChatGPT and Grok cited them at 0%.
Which sources do AI answer engines cite most often when discussing SEO agencies?
Reddit appeared in 50 citations across 27 prompts, followed by clutch.co at 42 citations. Third-party review and comparison sites dominated: DesignRush appeared in 20 citations, and agencies.semrush.com in 22. Vendor domains thriveagency.com and firstpagesage.com ranked 3rd and 4th overall at 37 and 31 citations, but this still placed them below third-party sources.
Which AI answer engine recommends the broadest range of agencies?
Perplexity named 14 distinct agencies, the most of any engine. Claude named 12, Google Gemini and Google AI Overview each named 9–10, while ChatGPT named only 4. Grok named 7 brands but showed extreme concentration on Directive (27.5% of prompts) and Portent (12.5%).
The 40 prompts we tested— every brand scored against the same set
No prompt names a brand. A prompt that names one hands it a guaranteed mention — in our per-brand audit data, prompts naming a brand return a 97.5% mention rate against 8.6% for prompts that don't.
- 1best seo agencyrecommendation10 brands
- 2top seo agencies 2026recommendation10 brands
- 3who should i hire for seorecommendation4 brands
- 4seo agency near merecommendation2 brands
- 5affordable seo agencyrecommendation7 brands
- 6seo agencies that actually workrecommendation9 brands
- 7seo agency reviewsrecommendation10 brands
- 8how to choose an seo agencyawareness4 brands
- 9seo agency for real estateindustry3 brands
- 10seo agency for healthcareindustry4 brands
- 11seo agency for constructionindustry5 brands
- 12seo agency for nonprofitsindustry2 brands
- 13seo services for law firmsindustry2 brands
- 14seo agency for ecommerceindustry4 brands
- 15cheap seo agencyuse-case3 brands
- 16seo agency under $500 a monthuse-case4 brands
- 17mid market seo agencyuse-case4 brands
- 18enterprise level seo agencyuse-case3 brands
- 19freelance seo vs agencycomparison2 brands
- 20boutique vs full service seo agencycomparison0 brands
- 21should i hire an seo agency or do it in housecomparison0 brands
- 22small seo agency vs largecomparison0 brands
- 23local seo agency vs nationalcomparison0 brands
- 24seo agency for b2b saasuse-case3 brands
- 25seo agency for startupsuse-case5 brands
- 26seo agency for local businessesuse-case6 brands
- 27seo agency for small teamsuse-case9 brands
- 28seo agency with in house teamuse-case4 brands
- 29seo agencies that guarantee resultsrecommendation6 brands
- 30seo agency for my real estate brokerageindustry4 brands
- 31seo for dental practiceindustry1 brand
- 32seo for plumbing contractorindustry3 brands
- 33seo agency for online storeindustry6 brands
- 34seo agency for accounting firmindustry3 brands
- 35seo agency for therapistindustry3 brands
- 36white label seo agencyuse-case4 brands
- 37seo agency that charges per resultuse-case1 brand
- 38seo retainer agencyuse-case0 brands
- 39should i hire seo agency or consultantcomparison0 brands
- 40specialized seo agency vs generalistcomparison0 brands
Most cited sources
The domains these engines pulled from when answering. 1,453 citations across 630 distinct domains, 85% of them to third-party sites rather than to a vendor's own domain — that share is roughly how much of this category's visibility is decided off-site.
| # | Source | Citations | Prompts | Engines | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | reddit.com | 50 | 27 | 3 | 3.4% |
| 2 | clutch.covendor site | 42 | 20 | 5 | 2.9% |
| 3 | thriveagency.com | 37 | 19 | 4 | 2.5% |
| 4 | firstpagesage.com | 31 | 19 | 4 | 2.1% |
| 5 | agencies.semrush.com | 22 | 11 | 3 | 1.5% |
| 6 | coalitiontechnologies.comvendor site | 21 | 12 | 4 | 1.4% |
| 7 | designrush.com | 20 | 15 | 4 | 1.4% |
| 8 | linkedin.comvendor site | 19 | 13 | 2 | 1.3% |
| 9 | seo.comvendor site | 18 | 13 | 4 | 1.2% |
| 10 | youtube.com | 18 | 13 | 2 | 1.2% |
| 11 | outerboxdesign.comvendor site | 16 | 7 | 3 | 1.1% |
| 12 | seoprofy.com | 16 | 12 | 4 | 1.1% |
| 13 | resultfirst.com | 15 | 4 | 4 | 1.0% |
| 14 | searchbloom.com | 15 | 9 | 4 | 1.0% |
| 15 | google.comvendor site | 14 | 1 | 1 | 1.0% |
| 16 | embarque.io | 13 | 10 | 3 | 0.9% |
| 17 | webfx.comvendor site | 13 | 10 | 4 | 0.9% |
| 18 | focus-digital.co | 11 | 7 | 3 | 0.8% |
| 19 | onelittleweb.com | 11 | 9 | 3 | 0.8% |
| 20 | webtonic.io | 11 | 6 | 3 | 0.8% |
| 21 | 1digitalagency.com | 10 | 6 | 2 | 0.7% |
| 22 | siegemedia.comvendor site | 9 | 6 | 3 | 0.6% |
| 23 | softtrix.com | 9 | 5 | 4 | 0.6% |
| 24 | beomniscient.com | 8 | 6 | 3 | 0.6% |
| 25 | seranking.comvendor site | 8 | 7 | 3 | 0.6% |
| 26 | breakingb2b.com | 7 | 2 | 3 | 0.5% |
| 27 | rebootonline.com | 7 | 4 | 3 | 0.5% |
| 28 | semrush.comvendor site | 7 | 6 | 2 | 0.5% |
| 29 | elevationweb.org | 6 | 1 | 3 | 0.4% |
| 30 | goodfirms.co | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0.4% |
| 31 | growandconvert.com | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0.4% |
| 32 | helium-seo.com | 6 | 3 | 4 | 0.4% |
| 33 | luxurypresence.com | 6 | 2 | 3 | 0.4% |
| 34 | nathanojaokomo.com | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0.4% |
| 35 | seotuners.com | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0.4% |
| 36 | silverbackstrategies.com | 6 | 4 | 3 | 0.4% |
| 37 | theaffordableseoservices.com | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0.4% |
| 38 | thestacc.com | 6 | 5 | 2 | 0.4% |
| 39 | thryv.com | 6 | 4 | 3 | 0.4% |
| 40 | 6smarketers.com | 5 | 5 | 2 | 0.3% |
Top 40 of the domains cited in this run. Grok is absent from these counts entirely — it answers without web search and returns no sources.
About this data
Everything here is derived from publicly available output. We sent 40 prompts to 6 publicly accessible AI answer engines and recorded which brands each engine named and which sources it cited. No private, proprietary or customer data is involved, and no brand paid for or influenced its position.
Every answer behind these numbers is retained, so any figure on this page can be traced back to the specific prompt, engine and response that produced it.
If your company appears here and you believe the result is wrong, get in touch — we are happy to re-run the analysis for your brand and share what we find. If you would prefer not to be listed, we can remove your company name from this leaderboard in most cases. Either way, email [email protected].