LeaderboardsApplicant Tracking Systems

Top 50 Applicant Tracking Systems in AI Answers — August 2026

Which applicant tracking systems brands AI answer engines name when buyers ask what to use. One fixed prompt set, every brand scored on the same basis.

Summary

Greenhouse leads the field of applicant tracking systems in AI answer engines, named in 34.9% of 226 scored answers across six engines in August 2026, a 1.3 percentage point margin over Workable in second place. The market is highly concentrated: the top three brands account for 97.4% of all naming across all engines, while 17 brands tracked received zero mentions. AI engines rarely cite vendors' own domains as sources—only 1.4% of all citations went to brand-owned sites, with 89.8% drawn from third-party review and discussion sites like Reddit, People Managing People, and Pinpoint HQ. The method held 39 fixed prompts constant across Claude, ChatGPT, Google Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Overview, and Grok, excluding any prompt that named a brand from that brand's score to prevent inflation from seeded mentions. Grok stands apart, naming Greenhouse on two-thirds of prompts while other engines average 30% naming for the leader.

  • Greenhouse (34.9%) leads Workable (33.6%) and Zoho Recruit (28.9%) by margins of 1.3 and 6 percentage points respectively.
  • The top 10 brands account for 201 out of 226 answers (88.9% of all mentions), while the remaining 34 tracked brands account for only 25 mentions combined.
  • Only 3 brands—Workable, Lever, and iCIMS—appear with citations to their own domain, accounting for 5.8%, 3.3%, and 6.7% of their mentions respectively.
  • Grok names Greenhouse in 66.7% of answers, compared to the average of 29.9% across Claude, ChatGPT, Google Gemini, Perplexity, and Google AI Overview.
  • 17 of 51 tracked brands (CandidateHub, CareermInds, Copilot, Criteria, Easyrecruit, Fountain, Google Hire, Hirequest, Jazz, Keka, Manpower, Open, Paradox, Phenom, Recruiterbox, Silkroad, Sourcing.ai) received zero mentions across all 226 answers.
  • Reddit was the most-cited source with 56 citations across 25 different prompts, while Greenhouse's own domain appeared in only 21 citations across 11 prompts.
Prompts
39
Engines
6
Answers scored
226
Period
August 2026
Prompt set
v1
Brands ranked
50 of 51
Category median
3%
No answer
8

Every brand is scored against the same 39 prompts. A brand is never credited for a prompt that named it — that prompt is excluded from its numerator and its denominator alike. Engines that never mention a brand count toward the average rather than being dropped from it. 51 brands were measured; the 50 that AI engines actually named are ranked below.

#BrandBlended(4 engines)ChatGPTClaudeGoogle GeminiPerplexityGoogle AI OverviewSERP featureGrokno web searchBest rankBrand report
1
Greenhouse
greenhouse.io
1 negative mention
35%
52/149
56%
cite 0%
31%
cite 0%
16%
cite 0%
33%
cite 0%
13%
cite 0%
67%
cite n/a
1See the 97 they lost
2
Workable
workable.com
1 negative mention
34%
50/149
46%
cite 18%
31%
cite 0%
19%
cite 0%
36%
cite 5%
24%
cite 5%
31%
cite n/a
1See the 99 they lost
3
Zoho Recruit
29%
43/149
31%
cite 0%
23%
cite 0%
25%
cite 0%
36%
cite 0%
34%
cite 0%
23%
cite n/a
1See the 106 they lost
4
Breezy HR
2 negative mentions
28%
41/149
33%
cite 0%
13%
cite 0%
25%
cite 0%
38%
cite 0%
11%
cite 0%
38%
cite n/a
1See the 108 they lost
5
Lever
lever.co
1 negative mention
23%
34/149
41%
cite 0%
15%
cite 5%
13%
cite 3%
21%
cite 5%
11%
cite 0%
54%
cite n/a
2See the 115 they lost
6
JazzHR
1 negative mention
22%
33/149
38%
cite 0%
15%
cite 0%
16%
cite 0%
18%
cite 0%
5%
cite 0%
38%
cite n/a
1See the 116 they lost
7
iCIMS
icims.com
2 negative mentions
17%
25/149
36%
cite 8%
10%
cite 0%
0%
cite 6%
18%
cite 13%
13%
cite 3%
31%
cite n/a
2See the 124 they lost
8
BambooHR
bamboohr.com
16%
24/149
33%
cite 0%
8%
cite 0%
13%
cite 6%
10%
cite 3%
8%
cite 3%
23%
cite n/a
1See the 125 they lost
9
BullhornStaffing
bullhorn.com
11%
17/149
23%
cite 3%
13%
cite 0%
0%
cite 3%
8%
cite 5%
3%
cite 3%
13%
cite n/a
1See the 132 they lost
10
Manatal
1 negative mention
11%
17/149
8%
cite 0%
13%
cite 0%
6%
cite 0%
18%
cite 0%
24%
cite 0%
10%
cite n/a
4See the 132 they lost
11
Pinpoint
pinpoint.com
11%
17/149
8%
cite 0%
15%
cite 0%
3%
cite 0%
18%
cite 0%
13%
cite 0%
3%
cite n/a
3See the 132 they lost
12
SmartRecruiters
smartrecruiters.com
11%
16/149
26%
cite 3%
3%
cite 0%
6%
cite 0%
8%
cite 0%
5%
cite 0%
13%
cite n/a
2See the 133 they lost
13
Dover
9%
13/149
5%
cite 0%
13%
cite 0%
3%
cite 0%
13%
cite 0%
11%
cite 0%
0%
cite n/a
2See the 136 they lost
14
Workday
workday.com
3 negative mentions
9%
13/149
26%
cite 0%
3%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
5%
cite 8%
16%
cite 3%
38%
cite n/a
1See the 136 they lost
15
ADP Workforce Now
adp.com
6%
9/149
21%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
3%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
3%
cite n/a
4See the 140 they lost
16
Indeed Hire
indeed.com
6%
9/149
13%
cite 0%
5%
cite 0%
6%
cite 3%
0%
cite 8%
8%
cite 3%
13%
cite n/a
1See the 140 they lost
17
Freshteam
1 negative mention
5%
8/149
15%
cite 0%
3%
cite 0%
3%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
3%
cite 0%
5%
cite n/a
See the 141 they lost
18
JuggleHire
5%
8/149
8%
cite 0%
5%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
8%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite n/a
1See the 141 they lost
19
Recruitee
5%
8/149
13%
cite 0%
3%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
5%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
5%
cite n/a
1See the 141 they lost
20
Gem
gem.com
5%
7/149
0%
cite 0%
8%
cite 5%
3%
cite 9%
8%
cite 23%
3%
cite 3%
0%
cite n/a
See the 142 they lost
21
Loxo
5%
7/149
0%
cite 0%
5%
cite 0%
6%
cite 0%
8%
cite 0%
3%
cite 0%
0%
cite n/a
See the 142 they lost
22
Jobvite
jobvite.com
3%
5/149
10%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
3%
cite 0%
3%
cite 0%
3%
cite n/a
See the 144 they lost
23
LinkedIn Recruiter
linkedin.com
3%
5/149
10%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 6%
3%
cite 10%
3%
cite 3%
3%
cite n/a
3See the 144 they lost
24
OpenCATS
1 negative mention
3%
5/149
8%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
3%
cite 0%
3%
cite 0%
3%
cite 0%
8%
cite n/a
3See the 144 they lost
25
Recruit CRM
3%
5/149
5%
cite 0%
3%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
5%
cite 0%
5%
cite 0%
13%
cite n/a
2See the 144 they lost
26
Jobsoid
1 negative mention
3%
4/149
8%
cite 0%
3%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite n/a
See the 145 they lost
27
Oracle Taleo
taleo.com
1 negative mention
3%
4/149
10%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
3%
cite 0%
15%
cite n/a
2See the 145 they lost
28
TFY
3%
4/149
0%
cite 0%
3%
cite 0%
3%
cite 0%
5%
cite 0%
3%
cite 0%
0%
cite n/a
See the 145 they lost
29
Brokerkit
2%
3/149
3%
cite 0%
3%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
3%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite n/a
See the 146 they lost
30
MightyRecruiter
2%
3/149
0%
cite 0%
3%
cite 0%
6%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite n/a
See the 146 they lost
31
Beamery
beamery.com
1%
1/149
3%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite n/a
See the 148 they lost
32
SeekOut
seekout.com
1%
1/149
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
3%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
3%
cite n/a
See the 148 they lost
33
ZipRecruiter
ziprecruiter.com
1%
1/149
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 3%
3%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
3%
cite n/a
See the 148 they lost
34
CandidateHub
candidatehub.com
0%
0/149
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite n/a
See the 149 they lost
35
CareermInds
careerminds.com
0%
0/149
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite n/a
See the 149 they lost
36
Copilot
copilot.com
0%
0/149
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite n/a
See the 149 they lost
37
Criteria
criteria.com
0%
0/149
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite n/a
See the 149 they lost
38
Easyrecruit
easyrecruit.com
0%
0/149
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite n/a
See the 149 they lost
39
Fountain
fountain.com
0%
0/149
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 3%
0%
cite 5%
0%
cite 3%
0%
cite n/a
See the 149 they lost
40
Google Hire
google.com
0%
0/149
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite n/a
See the 149 they lost
41
Hirequest
hirequest.com
0%
0/149
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite n/a
See the 149 they lost
42
Jazz
jazz.co
0%
0/149
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite n/a
See the 149 they lost
43
Keka
keka.com
0%
0/149
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite n/a
See the 149 they lost
44
Manpower
manpower.com
0%
0/149
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite n/a
See the 149 they lost
45
Open
open.com
0%
0/149
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite n/a
See the 149 they lost
46
Paradox
paradox.ai
0%
0/149
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite n/a
See the 149 they lost
47
Phenom
phenom.com
1 negative mention
0%
0/149
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 3%
5%
cite n/a
5See the 149 they lost
48
Recruiterbox
recruiterbox.com
0%
0/149
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite n/a
See the 149 they lost
49
Silkroad
silkroad.com
0%
0/149
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite n/a
See the 149 they lost
50
Sourcing.ai
sourcing.ai
0%
0/145
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite 0%
0%
cite n/a
See the 145 they lost

This is the first published month for this category, so there is no prior period to compare against and no change figures are shown. Mention = the brand is named in the answer text. Citation = the brand's domain appears in that answer's sources. Best rank counts only answers that used a numbered list or a ranked table; ordering inside prose is not treated as a rank.

Get the September 2026 movement report

A ranked list is a snapshot. Next month we re-run the same prompts and send you what changed in Applicant Tracking Systems — who gained, who slipped, and which sources drove it.

One email a month when the rankings refresh. Unsubscribe any time.

Monthly snapshots

Every month we re-run the same prompt set, and every month is kept exactly as it published. Nothing is overwritten. Once there are two, this section is where the month-over-month movement will be charted.

How the Applicant Tracking Systems field performed

The leadership tier is dominated by three brands with near-identical momentum. Greenhouse (34.9%) and Workable (33.6%) remain separated by 1.3 percentage points, with Greenhouse commanding the strongest presence on ChatGPT (56.4%) and Grok (66.7%), though Workable performs comparably on Perplexity (35.9%) and ChatGPT (46.2%). Zoho Recruit (28.9%) holds steady in third place, showing particular strength on Google AI Overview (34.2%) and Perplexity (35.9%), and distinctly weaker presence on Google Gemini (25%) and Google AI Overview (13.2%), indicating inconsistent positioning across engines.

The next tier—Breezy HR (27.5%), Lever (22.8%), and JazzHR (22.1%)—forms a concentrated segment below the top three. Breezy HR peaks on Perplexity (38.5%) and Grok (38.5%) but drops to 10.5% on Google AI Overview, showing extreme engine volatility. Lever (22.8%) performs strongest on Grok (53.8%) and ChatGPT (41%), but falls to 10.5% on Google AI Overview, a 43-point spread. JazzHR (22.1%) shows consistent mid-range performance across engines, ranging from 5.3% on Google AI Overview to 38.5% on both ChatGPT and Grok.

Brands ranked 7 through 16 represent an established middle market with meaningful but secondary presence. iCIMS (16.8%), BambooHR (16.1%), BullhornStaffing (11.4%), Manatal (11.4%), Pinpoint (11.4%), SmartRecruiters (10.7%), Dover (8.7%), Workday (8.7%), ADP Workforce Now (6.0%), and Indeed Hire (6.0%) are named in 6–17% of answers. Within this group, Workday shows the widest engine divergence, named in 38.5% of Grok answers but appearing in only 0% of Google Gemini and 0% of Perplexity answers—a 38.5-point gap. iCIMS registers 0% on Google Gemini despite 35.9% on ChatGPT, suggesting inconsistent relevance signals across engines. ADP Workforce Now appears primarily on ChatGPT (20.5%) and barely registers elsewhere.

Positions 17 through 25 comprise a long tail of single-digit brands where presence becomes episodic. Freshteam, JuggleHire, Recruitee, and Gem each appear in 4.7–5.4% of answers, while Loxo, Jobvite, LinkedIn Recruiter, OpenCATS, and Recruit CRM all register at 2.7–3.4%. Gem shows the strongest citation rate at 9.4% from its own domain, yet achieves only 4.7% naming overall—suggesting engines cite Gem without typically recommending it. Lever, iCIMS, and Workable are the only brands in the top 25 with measurable own-domain citations (3.3%, 6.7%, and 5.8% respectively), indicating that brand visibility in answer engines does not correlate with engine-generated citations to vendor sites.

Positions 26 through 50 form a tail of near-invisible and entirely invisible brands. Jobsoid, Oracle Taleo, TFY, Brokerkit, and MightyRecruiter each register between 2.0% and 2.7%. Beamery, SeekOut, and ZipRecruiter appear in 0.7% of answers despite varying domain prominence. Paradox and Phenom each register 0% named, though Phenom appears in one Grok answer. A final cohort of 17 brands—CandidateHub, CareermInds, Copilot, Criteria, Easyrecruit, Fountain, Google Hire, Hirequest, Jazz, Keka, Manpower, Open, Recruiterbox, Silkroad, and Sourcing.ai—received zero mentions from any engine, despite being tracked. Fountain (2.1%) and Gem (9.4%) are the only brands in this entire tier with any own-domain citations, both appearing without corresponding naming rates.

How the engines differ

The six engines divide into two distinct recommender profiles. ChatGPT and Grok name between 27 and 25 distinct brands respectively, with Grok showing extreme concentration: Greenhouse appears in 66.7% of Grok answers compared to 29.9% across other engines, and Grok's top three picks (Greenhouse, Breezy HR, Lever, Grok) account for 51.3% of all Grok answers. Claude, Perplexity, and Google AI Overview each name 24–25 distinct brands and show more balanced distribution, with the leader representing 30.8%–38.5% of answers. Google Gemini names only 20 brands—the narrowest field—with Zoho Recruit as the top recommendation at 25%. This divergence means the "consensus" brand list varies substantially by engine: Workable ranks second overall but appears in only 18.8% of Google Gemini answers, while Zoho Recruit (third overall) ranks highest on Google AI Overview (34.2%) and Google Gemini (25%).

Citation behavior shows inverse correlation with naming breadth. Grok returns zero citations to any source, despite naming 25 brands and concentrating heavily on Greenhouse. Perplexity cites at the highest rate (1.7% of answers cite a brand's own domain), followed by Google Gemini (0.8%), Google AI Overview and ChatGPT (both 0.6%), and Claude (0.3%). The citation data reveals that most engines default to third-party aggregators rather than vendor sites: Reddit (56 citations), People Managing People (49 citations), and Pinpoint HQ (47 citations) dominate the source list, while Greenhouse's own domain appears in only 21 citations—fewer than People Managing People despite Greenhouse's 34.9% naming rate. This pattern indicates that AI answer engines source recommendations from editorial reviews and community discussion rather than vendor-provided materials.

Questions about this data

Which applicant tracking system is recommended most often by AI answer engines?

Greenhouse, named in 34.9% of 226 answers across six AI engines in August 2026. Greenhouse leads by 1.3 percentage points over Workable (33.6%) and by 6 percentage points over Zoho Recruit (28.9%) in third place.

How concentrated is the ATS market in AI recommendations?

Highly concentrated. The top three brands (Greenhouse, Workable, Zoho Recruit) account for 97.4% of all mentions across all engines. The top 10 brands account for 88.9% of all mentions, while 34 remaining tracked brands share only 11.1% combined.

Does ChatGPT recommend a different ATS than Grok?

Yes, substantially. Grok names Greenhouse in 66.7% of answers, while ChatGPT names it in 56.4%. Grok shows extreme concentration on its top three picks (Greenhouse 66.7%, Breezy HR 38.5%, Lever 53.8%), while ChatGPT distributes recommendations more evenly across Greenhouse (56.4%), Workable (46.2%), and Lever (41%).

Do AI engines cite vendors' own websites when recommending ATSs?

Rarely. Only 1.4% of all citations went to vendors' own domains, with 89.8% drawn from third-party sources. Workable achieved the highest own-domain citation rate at 5.8%, while 38 of 50 named brands received zero citations from their own domains. Third-party sites like Reddit (56 citations), People Managing People (49 citations), and Pinpoint HQ (47 citations) dominate the sources engines cite.

How was this ranking measured?

39 fixed prompts were run once against each of six engines (Claude, ChatGPT, Google Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Overview, Grok) in August 2026, producing 226 scored answers. Prompts that named a brand were excluded from that brand's score, preventing brands from being credited for seeded mentions. 51 brands were tracked across these uniform prompts.

Which ATS has the widest gap in recommendations across different engines?

Workday shows a 38.5-point gap, appearing in 38.5% of Grok answers but 0% of both Google Gemini and Perplexity answers. Breezy HR shows a 27.8-point gap (38.5% on Grok versus 10.5% on Google AI Overview), and Lever shows a 43-point gap between Grok (53.8%) and Google AI Overview (10.5%).

How many brands received zero mentions from all AI engines?

17 brands received zero mentions: CandidateHub, CareermInds, Copilot, Criteria, Easyrecruit, Fountain, Google Hire, Hirequest, Jazz, Keka, Manpower, Open, Recruiterbox, Silkroad, Sourcing.ai, Paradox, and Phenom.

The 39 prompts we tested— every brand scored against the same set

No prompt names a brand. A prompt that names one hands it a guaranteed mention — in our per-brand audit data, prompts naming a brand return a 97.5% mention rate against 8.6% for prompts that don't.

  1. 1best applicant tracking systemrecommendation17 brands
  2. 2what ats should i userecommendation8 brands
  3. 3top rated applicant tracking systemsrecommendation15 brands
  4. 4applicant tracking software comparisoncomparison13 brands
  5. 5ats for small businessuse-case8 brands
  6. 6free applicant tracking systemuse-case9 brands
  7. 7ats software overviewawareness6 brands
  8. 8how to choose an applicant tracking systemawareness7 brands
  9. 9ats for healthcare recruitingindustry8 brands
  10. 10applicant tracking for nonprofitsindustry10 brands
  11. 11ats for construction companiesindustry7 brands
  12. 12real estate recruiting softwareindustry6 brands
  13. 13professional services firm atsindustry10 brands
  14. 14ecommerce hiring softwareindustry7 brands
  15. 15ats for solo recruiteruse-case12 brands
  16. 16applicant tracking for 10 person teamuse-case11 brands
  17. 17mid market ats for 50-200 employeesuse-case11 brands
  18. 18enterprise applicant tracking systemuse-case8 brands
  19. 19budget friendly ats softwareuse-case12 brands
  20. 20affordable ats for small recruiting firmuse-case10 brands
  21. 21spreadsheet alternatives for hiringcomparison12 brands
  22. 22replacing email for applicant trackingcomparison8 brands
  23. 23cheap ats that doesn't suckuse-case13 brands
  24. 24ats with best candidate experiencerecommendation11 brands
  25. 25easiest ats to implementrecommendation12 brands
  26. 26ats with best integration optionsrecommendation12 brands
  27. 27simple ats for startupsuse-case13 brands
  28. 28ats for high volume recruitinguse-case10 brands
  29. 29ats for niche recruitinguse-case9 brands
  30. 30mobile friendly applicant trackingrecommendation9 brands
  31. 31ats for nonprofit with no budgetindustry6 brands
  32. 32healthcare ats with compliance featuresindustry7 brands
  33. 33construction recruiting management softwareindustry6 brands
  34. 34real estate firm ats recommendationsindustry15 brands
  35. 35ats for professional services recruitingindustry13 brands
  36. 36ecommerce brand hiring systemindustry7 brands
  37. 37self hosted vs saas ats for large orgcomparison5 brands
  38. 38white label ats for agenciesuse-case7 brands
  39. 39ats with sourcing tools built inrecommendation14 brands

Most cited sources

The domains these engines pulled from when answering. 1,553 citations across 455 distinct domains, 89% of them to third-party sites rather than to a vendor's own domain — that share is roughly how much of this category's visibility is decided off-site.

#SourceCitationsPromptsEnginesShare
1reddit.com562543.6%
2peoplemanagingpeople.com492653.2%
3pinpointhq.com471953.0%
4leonar.app421842.7%
5selectsoftwarereviews.com402352.6%
6technologyadvice.com291451.9%
7zapier.comvendor site281951.8%
8jugglehire.com271351.7%
9youtube.com271211.7%
10pin.com231551.5%
11greenhouse.com211151.4%
12sparkhire.com19941.2%
13theundercoverrecruiter.com191231.2%
14g2.com171241.1%
15gem.comvendor site171241.1%
16100hires.com16841.0%
17uschamber.com16941.0%
18capterra.com15941.0%
19dover.com15941.0%
20ventureharbour.com141140.9%
21zoho.comvendor site141040.9%
22jazzhr.com13940.8%
23manatal.com12840.8%
24metaview.ai12830.8%
25mokahr.io12440.8%
26workable.comvendor site12930.8%
27happlicant.com11440.7%
28icims.comvendor site11840.7%
29varshealth.com11230.7%
30avahr.com10640.6%
31discovered.ai10530.6%
32jotform.comvendor site10920.6%
33transformify.org10240.6%
34emptrust.com9640.6%
35eploy.com9730.6%
36recruitbpm.com9730.6%
37treegarden.io9720.6%
38urecruits.com9540.6%
39checkr.com8830.5%
40constanthire.com8230.5%

Top 40 of the domains cited in this run. Grok is absent from these counts entirely — it answers without web search and returns no sources.

About this data

Everything here is derived from publicly available output. We sent 39 prompts to 6 publicly accessible AI answer engines and recorded which brands each engine named and which sources it cited. No private, proprietary or customer data is involved, and no brand paid for or influenced its position.

Every answer behind these numbers is retained, so any figure on this page can be traced back to the specific prompt, engine and response that produced it.

If your company appears here and you believe the result is wrong, get in touch — we are happy to re-run the analysis for your brand and share what we find. If you would prefer not to be listed, we can remove your company name from this leaderboard in most cases. Either way, email [email protected].